
Survey Report On Existence Of 'Permanent Establishment' In Tax Year Not Relevant For Previous/Future AYs: Delhi HC Grants Relief To Swiss Co
Live LawThe Delhi High Court has held that the existence of a foreign entity's Permanent Establishment in India is required to be determined in law for each year separately on the basis of the scope, extent, nature and duration of activities in each year. A division bench of Justices Yashwant Varma and Ravinder Dudeja made the observation while dealing with a Swiss company's case, which was aggrieved by various reassessment notices issued for AYs 2013-18 for alleged escapement of income generated by its alleged PE, namely, GE T&D India Ltd. While allowing the company's plea against such action, the High Court heavily relied on a coordinate bench decision in Grid Solutions OY v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation & Anr. Similarly in Dwarkadas Kesardeo Morarka v Commissioner of Income Tax, Central the Supreme Court had held that in the matter of assessment of income tax, each year's assessment is complete and the decision arrived at in a previous year on materials before the taxing authorities cannot be regarded as binding in the assessment for the subsequent years. with Mr. Aditya Vohra and Mr. Shashvat Dhamija, Advs for Petitioner; Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC, Mr. Anant Mann, JSC and Ms. Aditi Sabharwa, Adv for Respondent Case title: GE Grid GMBH v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr.
History of this topic

Whether Entity Is 'Permanent Establishment' Is A Fact-Specific Issue, Must Be Examined Separately For Different Tax Periods: Delhi High Court
Live Law
SC's Judgement In Abhisar Buildwell Case Doesn't Permit Reopening Of Assessments Beyond Limitation Period U/S 149(1) Of IT Act: Delhi HC
Live Law
Tax Weekly Round-Up: December 09 - December 15, 2024
Live Law
Assessee Can Confine Settlement Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act To Disputes Which Were Subject Matter Of Its Appeal: Delhi HC
Live Law
AO Can't Disregard ITAT's Direction To Re-examine Issue By Referring To CBDT Circular: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Once Issue Of Arm's Length Remuneration Settled By TPO, Question Of Ascertaining Existence Of PE Is Academic; Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Proceedings
Live Law
Direct Tax Cases Quarterly Digest 2024
Live Law
Provisions Of Section 44BB Not Applicable In Absence Of PE: ITAT
Live Law
Explanation To Section 14A Of Income Tax Act Will Not Apply Retrospectively: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Accessing The Premises Of A JV Company For Technical Assistance Can't Be Treated As Permanent Establishment Under DTAA : Delhi ITAT
Live LawDiscover Related



![Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: February 2025 [Citations 119- 251]](/static/images/error.jpg)





![IBC Weekly Round-Up [3rd March To 9th March, 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)





![IBC Monthly Digest [February 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)

















![[S.292B Income Tax Act] Inadvertent Mistakes In Reassessment Can Be Saved But Assessment Order Overlooking Apparent Error Cannot: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)







![IBC Weekly Round-Up [17th February-23rd February 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)


