News Analysis | Parsing the Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale's statement on the Balakot strike
The HinduBoth the format and the wording of Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale’s statement on Tuesday announcing the Indian Air Force's strikes on a terror training camp in Balakot, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan, indicated a restrained determination from New Delhi aimed at avoiding a military escalation. However, like the DGMO, Mr. Gokhale began with a preamble on Pakistan’s refusal to take action against the Jaish-e-Mohammed, despite evidence and information about the group responsible for the Parliament attack in 2001, Pathankot Airbase attack in 2016 and the most recent attack in Pulwama, being shared from “time to time” with Pakistani authorities, who turned a blind eye to Indian concerns and took “no concrete actions to dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism on its soil.” Mr. Gokhale said, “Information regarding the location of training camps in Pakistan and PoJK has been provided to Pakistan from time to time. The existence of such massive training facilities capable of training hundreds of Jihadis could not have functioned without the knowledge of Pakistan authorities.” Next, Mr. Gokhale referred to the fact that the strike was pre-emptive and necessitated by the “credible intelligence” that the JeM was planning, at its training camp, more such attacks on India, where “fidayeen jihadis” were being trained. Finally, Mr. Gokhale’s phrase “non-military pre-emptive action” aimed only at the JeM camp, not at military targets, and assiduously avoiding civilian casualties, is significant.