When Can High Courts Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 Despite Existence Of Statutory Remedies? Supreme Court Explains
11 months, 2 weeks ago

When Can High Courts Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 Despite Existence Of Statutory Remedies? Supreme Court Explains

Live Law  

Observing that the High Court should exercise due care and caution while entertaining the petitions under Article 226 of the constitution even when there exists an alternative statutory remedy, the Supreme Court on Wednesday deprecated the High Court's interference in the auction sale proceedings completed by the Bank at the instance of the borrower despite having statutory remedy. Observing that the High Court should exercise due care and caution while entertaining the petitions under Article 226 of the constitution even when there exists an alternative statutory remedy, the Supreme Court on Wednesday deprecated the High Court's interference in the auction sale proceedings completed by the Bank at the instance of the borrower despite having statutory remedy of appeal under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Challenging the Debt Recovery Tribunal's order of auction sale by the Bank under the SARFAESI Act, the borrower filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the constitution before the High Court. Interference By High Courts Under Article 226 Adversely Impacts Rights of Banks and Financial Institutions To Recover Dues Observing that High Courts have been entertaining petitions arising out of the DRT Act and the SARFAESI Act in spite of the availability of an effective alternative remedy, the court stated that the High Courts shall be reminded of the following words of this Court in the case of United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and Others.

Supreme Court Constitution High Courts Court Bank Courts Statutory High Article Petition Adv Remedy Statutory Remedy Drt Entertain 226  adv  mr  court  despite  226  supreme  courts  writ  remedies  existence  petition  article  constitution  explains  remedy  statutory  entertain  high

History of this topic

Supreme Court Disapproves Of High Court Interdicting Insolvency Process Against Personal Guarantor At Threshold Stage In Writ Jurisdiction
1 month, 1 week ago

Supreme Court Disapproves Of High Court Interdicting Insolvency Process Against Personal Guarantor At Threshold Stage In Writ Jurisdiction

Live Law  

The Supreme Court while deciding an appeal pertaining to insolvency proceedings initiated against a personal guarantor, observed that the High Court should not have prohibited such proceedings by holding that the guarantor's liability has been waived. "In light of this statutory scheme, which has been followed by the Adjudicating Authority, we are of the view that the High Court incorrectly …

Article 226 | Writ Court Can Refuse Action Against Illegality To Do Substantial Justice : Supreme Court
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Article 226 | Writ Court Can Refuse Action Against Illegality To Do Substantial Justice : Supreme Court

Live Law  

Recently, the Supreme Court reiterated that the writ court does not interfere in cases of mere violation of any statutory provision or norms unless the same has caused injustice. While administering law it is to be tempered with equity and if the equitable situation demands after setting right the legal formulations not to take it to the logical end, the …

Higher Court's Order Becomes Final, Trial Court's Order Gets Merged With It : Supreme Court Explains Doctrine Of Merger
2 months, 1 week ago

Higher Court's Order Becomes Final, Trial Court's Order Gets Merged With It : Supreme Court Explains Doctrine Of Merger

Live Law  

Observing that there cannot be more than one decree or operative order governing the same subject matter at a given point in time, the Supreme Court explained the effect of merging the trial court's decree with that of the decree passed by the High Court in the second appeals. The High Court, while allowing the second appeal filed by the …

Sale By Way Of Public Auction Can't Be Set Aside Unless There's Material Irregularity Or Fraud/Collusion : Supreme Court
2 months, 2 weeks ago

Sale By Way Of Public Auction Can't Be Set Aside Unless There's Material Irregularity Or Fraud/Collusion : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has reiterated the principle that sale by way of public auction cannot be set aside until there is any material irregularity and/or illegality committed in holding the auction or if such auction was vitiated by any fraud or collusion. Reference was also made to the recent judgment in Celir LLP vs Ms Sumati Prasad Bafna and others …

High Court Can't Ordinarily Reappreciate Evidence In Article 226 Proceedings : Supreme Court
2 months, 3 weeks ago

High Court Can't Ordinarily Reappreciate Evidence In Article 226 Proceedings : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court reiterated that the High Court cannot reappreciate the evidence unless the appropriate Court has exceeded its jurisdiction or acted perversely. “It is a well-established principle that the High Court, while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot reappreciate the evidence and arrive at a finding of facts unless the authorities below had …

High Courts Guardians Of Fundamental Rights & Constitution, Must Not Mechanically Dismiss Writ Petitions Over Delays And Laches : Supreme Court
3 months, 1 week ago

High Courts Guardians Of Fundamental Rights & Constitution, Must Not Mechanically Dismiss Writ Petitions Over Delays And Laches : Supreme Court

Live Law  

In the case where Rs.5 lakhs honorarium was awarded to an 83-yr old ex-constable who saved lives by killing a dacoit in 1986, the Supreme Court recently held that High Courts in the country should not mechanically dismiss writ petitions seeking enforcement of fundamental rights on the ground of 'delay and laches', without considering all relevant factors.For context, the petitioner …

High Court Under Article 226/227 Can Examine Validity Of Interlocutory Orders Passed By Arbitrator: Bombay High Court
3 months, 2 weeks ago

High Court Under Article 226/227 Can Examine Validity Of Interlocutory Orders Passed By Arbitrator: Bombay High Court

Live Law  

The Bombay High Court bench of Justices Shailesh P. Brahme and S.G. Mehare has held that the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226/227 of the Constitution is not excluded from examining the validity of the interlocutory orders passed by the Arbitrator. S.B.P and Co. the Supreme Court has held that “the object of minimizing judicial intervention while the …

Invocation Of Article 227 Against Final Orders/ Judgments Passed By Sessions Court In Appeal Is 'Almost Barred': Kerala High Court
6 months, 3 weeks ago

Invocation Of Article 227 Against Final Orders/ Judgments Passed By Sessions Court In Appeal Is 'Almost Barred': Kerala High Court

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has held that there is almost an an absolute bar on challenging the final order or judgment passed by a Sessions Court in appeal, under Article 227 of the Constitution. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas referred to multiple Supreme Court decisions which held that a person cannot approach the High Court under Article 227 when there is …

Local Debt Recovery Tribunal Must Be Established In Jammu And Kashmir, Says Supreme Court
7 months, 3 weeks ago

Local Debt Recovery Tribunal Must Be Established In Jammu And Kashmir, Says Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court on Friday called for the establishment of local Debt Recovery Tribunals in Jammu and Kashmir. A bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih was hearing a plea by a bank against the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court's decision allowing challenges to actions under the SARFAESI Act to be made before the High …

Writ Petition Against Arbitrator's Order Not Maintainable Unless Exceptional Circumstances Or Bad Faith Can Be Shown: M.P. High Court
1 year, 1 month ago

Writ Petition Against Arbitrator's Order Not Maintainable Unless Exceptional Circumstances Or Bad Faith Can Be Shown: M.P. High Court

Live Law  

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh bench comprising Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice Devnarayan Mishra refused to exercise the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226/227 of the Indian Constitution for a matter involving dismissal of an application made to an Arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Petitioner. The High …

Can High Court Direct State Instrumentality To Award Contract In Favour Of Bidder Under Article 226? Supreme Court Discusses
1 year, 2 months ago

Can High Court Direct State Instrumentality To Award Contract In Favour Of Bidder Under Article 226? Supreme Court Discusses

Live Law  

The Supreme Court in a recent decision disapproved of the direction issued by the Rajasthan High Court directing the Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd to enter into a power purchasing agreement with a party. "In any case, the High Court, by the impugned judgment and order, could not have issued a mandamus to the instrumentalities of the State to enter …

SARFAESI Act | As per Unamended S.13(8), Borrower Has Right To Redeem Available Till Sale Certificate Is Registered & Possession Is Handed Over : Supreme Court
1 year, 5 months ago

SARFAESI Act | As per Unamended S.13(8), Borrower Has Right To Redeem Available Till Sale Certificate Is Registered & Possession Is Handed Over : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court, while deciding an appeal, settled the issue of right of redemption of a mortgaged property by a borrower under the unamended Section 13 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002. The Bench comprising of Justices Vikram Nath and Rajesh Bindal clearly held that as per the unamended Section 13 …

Article 226 | High Court Ought To Relegate Parties To Alternate Remedies When There Are Serious Factual Disputes: Supreme Court
1 year, 5 months ago

Article 226 | High Court Ought To Relegate Parties To Alternate Remedies When There Are Serious Factual Disputes: Supreme Court

Live Law  

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court, in its judgment dated October 13, 2023, opined that one of compelling reasons for relegating the writ petitioner to an alternative remedy may arise where there is a serious dispute between the parties on a question of fact and materials/evidence available on record are insufficient/inconclusive to enable the Court to come to a …

Borrowers Should Avail Statutory Remedies Under SARFAESI Act Before Invoking Article 226 Against Recovery Proceedings: Delhi High Court
1 year, 7 months ago

Borrowers Should Avail Statutory Remedies Under SARFAESI Act Before Invoking Article 226 Against Recovery Proceedings: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court recently observed that the SARFAESI Act provides statutory remedies for borrowers, including the right to appeal, and that the court should not interfere in recovery proceedings unless there is a clear violation of law. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav reiterated that the borrower will have to wait till measures under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act for …

SARFAESI Auction Can't Be Stayed Just Because Sale Agreement Holder Offered To Pay Dues, When Borrower Hasn't Invoked S.13(8) : Supreme Court
1 year, 10 months ago

SARFAESI Auction Can't Be Stayed Just Because Sale Agreement Holder Offered To Pay Dues, When Borrower Hasn't Invoked S.13(8) : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has held that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against action taken by Bank under Section 13 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, since an alternative statutory remedy exists under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act. Since the Borrower in the …

Challenge Under Section 17 Of The SARFAESI Act Against Action Taken By Secured Creditor, Would Not Bar Arbitration Proceedings: Delhi High Court
2 years, 4 months ago

Challenge Under Section 17 Of The SARFAESI Act Against Action Taken By Secured Creditor, Would Not Bar Arbitration Proceedings: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has reiterated that arbitration proceedings and proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests Act, 2002 can go hand in hand. The single bench of Justice V. Kameswar Rao held that even if a party intended to take action under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act by filing a petition …

Supreme Court Deprecates HC Practice Of Entertaining Writ Petitions Filed In SARFAESI Matters Without Exhausting Alternative Remedy
2 years, 4 months ago

Supreme Court Deprecates HC Practice Of Entertaining Writ Petitions Filed In SARFAESI Matters Without Exhausting Alternative Remedy

Live Law  

The Supreme Court deprecated the practice of entertaining writ petitions filed in SARFAESI matters without exhausting the alternative statutory remedy.In this case, the Telangana High Court set aside the e-auction sale held by the Bank under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 on. In this context, the bench comprising …

Writ Jurisdiction Can Be Exercised Only When Either The Person Or Authority To Which Writ Issued, Or Cause Of Action Is Within Its Territory: Delhi HC
2 years, 6 months ago

Writ Jurisdiction Can Be Exercised Only When Either The Person Or Authority To Which Writ Issued, Or Cause Of Action Is Within Its Territory: Delhi HC

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has observed that it can exercise its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India either when the person or authority to which the writ is to be issued is located within its territory, or the cause of action, in part or whole, arises within its territory. After the petitioner unsuccessfully appealed against the order …

Cannot Invoke Article 226 If An Effective And Statutory Remedy Exists Before NCLAT: Madras High Court
2 years, 8 months ago

Cannot Invoke Article 226 If An Effective And Statutory Remedy Exists Before NCLAT: Madras High Court

Live Law  

The High Court of Madras Bench comprising of Justice T. Raja and Justice K. Kumaresh Babu, while adjudicating a writ petition filed in Sunku Vasundhara v State Bank of India, has held that when an effective and statutory remedy lies before the Appellate Authority i.e. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, aggrieved parties cannot invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of …

Writ Petitions On The Ground Of 'Exceptional Circumstances' Against Order Passed By The Arbitral Tribunal Not Maintainable: Bombay High Court
2 years, 11 months ago

Writ Petitions On The Ground Of 'Exceptional Circumstances' Against Order Passed By The Arbitral Tribunal Not Maintainable: Bombay High Court

Live Law  

The Bombay High Court has ruled that remedy against orders passed under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lies elsewhere and the petitioners, aggrieved by the orders passed under Section 16, cannot file Writ Petitions under Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution of India on the ground of 'exceptional circumstances'. The Counsel for the petitioner …

Petitioner Cannot File Writ Petition Before Exercising Remedy U/S 17 Of SARFAESI Act; Madras High Court
3 years, 2 months ago

Petitioner Cannot File Writ Petition Before Exercising Remedy U/S 17 Of SARFAESI Act; Madras High Court

Live Law  

The Madras High Court, in a Bench comprising of Justice M. Duraiswamy and Justice Sathya Narayan Prasad in R. Ganesan v. M/s. ASREC Limited has reiterated the legal position and dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner due to non-exercise of alternate remedy of appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. The Petitioner filed a writ petition under …

Writ Petition By Borrowers Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Initiated By Private Banks/ARCs Not Maintainable: Supreme Court
3 years, 2 months ago

Writ Petition By Borrowers Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Initiated By Private Banks/ARCs Not Maintainable: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that a writ petition challenging proceedings under SARFAESI Act initiated by private banks/Asset Reconstruction Companies is not maintainable. "If proceedings are initiated under the SARFAESI Act and/or any proposed action is to be taken and the borrower is aggrieved by any of the actions of the private bank/bank/ARC, borrower has to avail the remedy under the …

Supreme Court Requests High Courts To Entertain SARFAESI, Bank Recovery Matters Under Writ Jurisdiction In View Of DRT/DRAT Vacancies
3 years, 3 months ago

Supreme Court Requests High Courts To Entertain SARFAESI, Bank Recovery Matters Under Writ Jurisdiction In View Of DRT/DRAT Vacancies

Live Law  

Taking note of the lack of operation of the Debts Recovery Tribunals and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals in many states due to non-filling of vacancies, the Supreme Court on Thursday passed an order requesting the High Courts to entertain applications under the SARFAESI under the writ jurisdiction as an interim measure. "To resolve the problem for the time being, …

Writ Petition Can Be Entertained Only In Exceptional Circumstances When Alternate Remedy Is Available: Supreme Court
3 years, 6 months ago

Writ Petition Can Be Entertained Only In Exceptional Circumstances When Alternate Remedy Is Available: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that, when an alternate remedy is available, a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution can be entertained by a High Court only in following exceptional circumstances: a breach of fundamental rights; a violation of the principles of natural justice; an excess of jurisdiction; or a challenge to the vires of the statute or. The …

Supreme Court Expresses Concerns Of Judicial Propriety, Discipline Over P&H High Court Entertaining Fresh Plea When Proceedings Before It Pending
3 years, 7 months ago

Supreme Court Expresses Concerns Of Judicial Propriety, Discipline Over P&H High Court Entertaining Fresh Plea When Proceedings Before It Pending

Live Law  

Noting that where the proceedings are pending before it and instead of pursuing them to the logical conclusion, the party chose to institute a fresh writ petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which the High Court has entertained, the Supreme Court expressed concerns of judicial propriety and discipline. "Despite the fact that this court is seized of the …

Being A Court Of Record, High Court Can Review Its Own Judgments Under Article 226 Of the Constitution: Kerala High Court
3 years, 9 months ago

Being A Court Of Record, High Court Can Review Its Own Judgments Under Article 226 Of the Constitution: Kerala High Court

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court on Friday iterated the legal proposition that High Courts as Courts of Record could review their own orders. Affirming the stance of the Single Judge, the Court said, "Discussion of facts made above would make it clear that while rendering the impugned judgment, learned single Judge was under the impression that the entire facts and circumstances …

Petition Styled As One Under Article 226 Would Not Bar High Court To Exercise Its Jurisdiction Which Otherwise It Possesses: Supreme Court
3 years, 11 months ago

Petition Styled As One Under Article 226 Would Not Bar High Court To Exercise Its Jurisdiction Which Otherwise It Possesses: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that a petition styled as one under Article 226 would not bar the High Court to exercise its jurisdiction which otherwise it possesses under a Statute and/or under Article 227 of the Constitution.In this case, the appellant's contention was that the order of the Wakf Tribunal could not be challenged by way of writ petition before …

Recording Of Reasons: Approach Of Article 136 Cannot Be Adopted While Deciding Petitions By The High Court Under Article 227 : Supreme Court
4 years, 1 month ago

Recording Of Reasons: Approach Of Article 136 Cannot Be Adopted While Deciding Petitions By The High Court Under Article 227 : Supreme Court

Live Law  

Supreme Court on Monday observed that the approach of Article 136 of the Constitution cannot be adopted while deciding petitions by the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. A Division Bench of Justice SK Kaul and Justice Hrishikesh Roy made the observation while hearing an appeal filed against order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court under …

[Article 226] Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Judicial Order Passed By High Court: SC [Read Order]
4 years, 6 months ago

[Article 226] Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Judicial Order Passed By High Court: SC [Read Order]

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has held that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would not be maintainable in order to challenge an order which has been passed by the High Court in the exercise of its judicial powers. The petitioner assailed this order passed by the High Court by filing a writ petition under Article 226 with a …

HC In Exercise Of Writ Jurisdiction Can Pass An Order Interdicting Legal Fiction, Provided It Had Not Come Into Operation: SC [Read Judgment]
5 years ago

HC In Exercise Of Writ Jurisdiction Can Pass An Order Interdicting Legal Fiction, Provided It Had Not Come Into Operation: SC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has observed that the High Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution can pass an order interdicting the legal fiction engrafted in a legislation, provided the legal fiction had not come into operation. The bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Navin Sinha reiterated that the power of the High Court under Article …

No Blanket Ban On Exercise Of Writ Jurisdiction By High Court Even When Alternative Remedies Are Available: SC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 2 months ago

No Blanket Ban On Exercise Of Writ Jurisdiction By High Court Even When Alternative Remedies Are Available: SC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The rule of alternative remedy is a rule of discretion and not a rule of jurisdiction, the Supreme Court said while reiterating that there cannot be a blanket ban on the exercise of writ jurisdiction by High Courts even when alternative remedies are available. The bench comprising Justice Deepak Gupta and Justice Aniruddha Bose was dealing with a civil appeal …

Alternative Remedy And Supervisory Jurisdiction Of High Courts Under Article 227 Of Constitution
5 years, 5 months ago

Alternative Remedy And Supervisory Jurisdiction Of High Courts Under Article 227 Of Constitution

Live Law  

Recently, a two judge bench of the Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment in which it observed that the availability of an appellate remedy in terms of the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure can be construed as a 'near total bar' for the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by High Courts.The principle …

Can SC Interfere With HC's Discretion Entertaining Writ Petition In Spite Of There Being Alternative Remedy? SC Bench Delivers Split Judgment [Read Judgment]
5 years, 6 months ago

Can SC Interfere With HC's Discretion Entertaining Writ Petition In Spite Of There Being Alternative Remedy? SC Bench Delivers Split Judgment [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

Can the Supreme Court interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution to quash the order of the High Court, merely on the ground of existence of an alternative remedy? A two judge bench comprising of Justice R. Banumathi and Justice Indira Banerjee recently delivered a split judgment on the issue.Disagreeing with Justice Banumathi's order setting aside a judgment of the …

Writ Petitions In Contract Matters Maintainable When There Is Arbitrariness By The State: SC [Read Order]
6 years ago

Writ Petitions In Contract Matters Maintainable When There Is Arbitrariness By The State: SC [Read Order]

Live Law  

The Supreme Court, last week, reiterated that even in contract matters, a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be entertained by the High Court, when there is arbitrariness on the part of the state. The bench comprising Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Justice Vineet Saran observed thus in an appeal filed against the High court …

Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Judicial Orders Are Maintainable, But Not Under Article 226: SC [Read Judgment]
6 years, 2 months ago

Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging Judicial Orders Are Maintainable, But Not Under Article 226: SC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has reiterated that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of certiorari against judicial orders passed by civil courts is not maintainable.The bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Indu Malhotra observed in State of Jharkhand v. Surendra Kumar Srivastava that writ petition under Article 227 challenging the orders passed by. …

Discover Related