Supreme Court Annual Digest 2022 - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) With Parallel Citations
Live LawInsolvency andBankruptcy Code, 2016 - Appealchallenging NCLAT order which reversed the order of the NCLT wherein it hadheld that the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and BankruptcyCode, 2016 was not time-barred - Allowed - The failure of the NCLAT as thefirst appellate authority to look into a very vital aspect such as this,vitiates its order, especially when NCLT has recorded a specific finding offact - Remanded. State TaxOfficer v. Rainbow Papers Ltd., 2022 LiveLaw 743 : AIR 2022 SC 4141 Section 5 & - "financial creditor"& "financial debt" Insolvencyand Bankruptcy Code 2016; Section 5, 5 - A liability inrespect of a claim arising out of a Recovery Certificate would be a "financialdebt" - The holder of the Recovery Certificate would be a financial creditorand would be entitled to initiate CIRP, if initiated within a period of threeyears from the date of issuance of the Recovery Certificate - Affirmed the viewtaken in Dena Bank vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy 10 SCC330. VidarbhaIndustries Power Ltd. v. Axis Bank Ltd., 2022 LiveLaw 587 : 8 SCC 352 Insolvencyand Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Section 7 - The AdjudicatingAuthority has been conferred the discretion to admit the application of theFinancial Creditor. SS Engineers v. Hindustan PetroleumCorporation Ltd; 2022 LiveLaw 617 Section 9 - Application for initiation of corporateinsolvency resolution process by operational creditor Insolvencyand Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Sections 9 - Section 9 mandatory - Anapplication of an Operational Creditor for initiation of CIRP under Section9 of the IBC is mandatorily required to be admitted if the application iscomplete in all respects and in compliance of the 28 requisites of the IBC andthe rules and regulations thereunder, there is no payment of the unpaidoperational debt, if notices for payment or the invoice has been delivered tothe Corporate Debtor by the Operational Creditor and no notice of dispute hasbeen received by the Operational Creditor. State TaxOfficer v. Rainbow Papers Ltd., 2022 LiveLaw 743 : AIR 2022 SC 4141 Section 31 - Approval of resolution plan Insolvencyand Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Section 31 - If a Resolution Plan is ex facie not in conformity with law and/or theprovisions of IBC and/or the Rules and Regulations framed thereunder, theResolution would have to be rejected - Even if Section 31 is construed toconfer discretionary power on the Adjudicating Authority to reject a ResolutionPlan, it has to be kept in mind that discretionary power cannot be exercisedarbitrarily, whimsically or without proper application of mind to the facts andcircumstances which require discretion to be exercised one way or the other.