Anti-terror laws should not be misused to quell dissent, says Justice DY Chandrachud
3 years, 5 months ago

Anti-terror laws should not be misused to quell dissent, says Justice DY Chandrachud

Firstpost  

The Supreme Court rule prompts it to ‘address the challenges of the 21st century, ranging from the pandemic to the rise of intolerance’, he added New Delhi: The criminal law, including the anti-terror legislation, should not be misused for quelling dissent or harassment of citizens, Supreme Court judge Justice DY Chandrachud has said while underlining the role of the apex court in protecting fundamental rights in challenging times. Observing that the Indian Supreme Court plays the role of a counter-majoritarian institution, Justice Chandrachud said it is the duty of the top court to protect the rights of socio-economic minorities. Justice Chandrachud made these comments on Monday while speaking on the “Role of the Supreme Court in protecting fundamental rights in challenging times” at a conference hosted by the American Bar Association with the Society of Indian Law Firms and Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. Referring to his judgement in the Arnab Goswami case, Justice Chandrachud said: “The criminal law, including anti-terror legislation should not be misused for quelling dissent or for the harassment of citizens.” “As I noted in Arnab Goswami vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors, ‘our courts must ensure that they continue to remain the first line of defense against the deprivation of the liberty of citizens.

History of this topic

DC Edit | Top court must pull up errant high court judge
1 week, 5 days ago
Expect Supreme Court to issue clear guidelines on ‘bulldozer justice’ issue, says Rahul Gandhi
3 months, 3 weeks ago
Person holding constitutional post trying to destroy economy: Jagdeep Dhankhar
4 months, 1 week ago
Dushyant Dave Writes: On Manipur, Supreme Court Must Be More Proactive
1 year, 5 months ago
Ecosystem Trying to Hurt India; If There's A Court Verdict, One Must Obey It: Dhankhar - News18
1 year, 8 months ago
Calcutta High Court judge issues contempt proceedings against lawyers
1 year, 11 months ago
India's Constitutional Values Are In Danger, Situation Worse Than Emergency : Sr Adv Raju Ramachandran
1 year, 11 months ago
NV Ramana, UU Lalit, DY Chandrachud, 2022 Saw 3 CJIs: So, How Was It?
1 year, 11 months ago
The attack on the last bastion — the judiciary
2 years ago
Justice AM Khanwilkar's Legacy : Regression of Fundamental Rights
2 years, 4 months ago
Haridwar Hate Speeches Call For UAPA, Sedition Charges: Advocate Dushyant Dave
2 years, 11 months ago
Government can’t be adversary to those who come to court for protection of basic rights: Supreme Court
3 years, 1 month ago
Criminal Law, Including Anti-Terror Legislation, Should Not Be Misused For Quelling Dissent Or Harassment To Citizens
3 years, 5 months ago
Magistrates & Trial Judges Also Have Responsibility In Safeguarding Citizens' Fundamental Right: Supreme Court
3 years, 9 months ago
Book Review "Supreme Court"
3 years, 10 months ago
A Shadow Supreme Court – No Way
4 years, 2 months ago

Discover Related