
Goods Imported Violating FTDR/DGFT Notifications Are 'Prohibited Goods' Liable For Confiscation Under Customs Act : Supreme Court
Live LawThe Supreme Court has held that peas and pulses, which were imported in violation of the notifications of the Central Government and the Director General of Foreign Trade issued under the Foreign Trade Act, are liable to absolute confiscation under Section 125 of the Customs Act as "prohibited goods".The Court granted a relaxation by allowing re-export of the goods. The Supreme Court has held that peas and pulses, which were imported in violation of the notifications of the Central Government and the Director General of Foreign Trade issued under the Foreign Trade Act, are liable to absolute confiscation under Section 125 of the Customs Act as "prohibited goods". Vide para 56 the Court held that "Significantly, if the purport of the order dated 15.10.2020 had been that even if Commissioner would be deciding the matter in appeal, he could not order absolute confiscation of the goods because the High Court had ordered their release, it would immediately lead to the position that the order dated 15.10.2020 of the High Court carried inherent contradictions. The Court proceed to hold that the subject goods are held liable to absolute confiscation but, in continuity with the order dated 18.03.2021 in these appeals, it is provided that if the importer concerned opts for re-export, within another period of two weeks from today, such a prayer for re- export may be granted by the authorities after recovery of the necessary redemption fine and subject to the importer discharging other statutory obligations.
History of this topic

Incorrect Classification Is Not By Itself Collusion/ Wilful Misstatement U/S 28AAA Customs Act; Prior Determination By DGFT Must: Delhi HC
Live Law
Incorrect Classification Is Not By Itself Collusion/ Wilful Misstatement U/S 28AAA Customs Act; Prior Determination By DGFT Must: Delhi HC
Live Law
Customs Act | Importer's Subsequent Import Bill Be Discarded If Undervalued To Previously Imported Identical Or Similar Goods: Supreme Court
Live Law
Customs Deputy Commissioner's Order Contrary To AAR's Ruling, Bombay High Court Quashes
Live Law
Delhi High Court Quashes Suspension Of License, Issued To Customs House Agent, Finding Order Illegal
Live Law
Knowledge Is A Necessary Element For Committing Abetment : Delhi High Court Quashes Penalty Against Customs Broker
Live Law
Import Of New/Unused Jewellery For Remaking After Melting In An SEZ, Is Permissible; Bombay High Court Sets Aside Levy Of Customs Duty
Live Law![[Section 110A Customs Act] Owner Does Not Include Importer Of Goods: Bombay High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Section 110A Customs Act] Owner Does Not Include Importer Of Goods: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Appeal Against CESTAT Order, On Classification Of Goods, And Determination Of Customs Duty Lies Before The Supreme Court: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Importers, govt. duel in Supreme Court over GST on ocean freight
The Hindu
Govt Frames Norms for Enforcement of 'Rules of Origin' for Imports Under FTAs
News 18![Delhi HC slams Customs Department for disobeying Court orders, imposes 10,000 as costs [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Delhi HC slams Customs Department for disobeying Court orders, imposes 10,000 as costs [Read Order]
Live Law![Delhi HC slams Customs Department for disobeying Court orders, imposes 10,000 as costs [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Delhi HC slams Customs Department for disobeying Court orders, imposes 10,000 as costs [Read Order]
Live Law
Excise duty exempted on indigenous goods sold at duty-free shops in India
India TV NewsDiscover Related













![[CGST ACT] Dept Can't Seize Goods If Quantity Or Weight Of Goods Is Found Correct On Physical Verification: Calcutta High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
































