Legality and Validity of substantive contract cannot be enquired under Section 8/Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Read Judgment]
8 years, 7 months ago

Legality and Validity of substantive contract cannot be enquired under Section 8/Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The scope of enquiry under the Section 45 is confined only to the question whether the arbitration agreement is “null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed”, the Court observed.The Apex Court in Sasan Power Limited vs. North American Coal Corporation India Private Limited, has held that the scope of enquiry under the Section 8 and Section 45 of the Arbitration and. The scope of enquiry under the Section 45 is confined only to the question whether the arbitration agreement is “null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed”, the Court observed. The Apex Court in Sasan Power Limited vs. North American Coal Corporation India Private Limited, has held that the scope of enquiry under the Section 8 and Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is confined only to the question whether the arbitration agreement is “null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed” but not the legality and validity of the substantive contract. Arbitration agreement/clause is not that governs rights and obligations arising out of the substantive contract: It only governs the way of settling disputes between the parties.” SCOPE OF ENQUIRY LIMITED TO ARBITRATION AGREEMENT, NOT SUBSTANTIVE CONTRACT The Court held: “The scope of enquiry under the Section 45 is confined only to the question whether the arbitration agreement is “null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed” but not the legality and validity of the substantive contract… All that we hold is that the scope of enquiry under the Section 45 does not extend to the examination of the legality of the substantive contract.

History of this topic

Arbitration | Dispute Regarding Full & Final Settlement Of Contract Is Arbitrable : Supreme Court
8 months, 1 week ago
Clause Captioned As “Arbitration”, Doesn’t Conclusively Imply Mandatory Nature Of Arbitration: Bombay High Court
2 years ago
Arbitration Clause Has To Be Given Effect Even If It Does Not Expressly State That Decision Of Arbitrator Is Final & Binding On Parties: Supreme Court
2 years, 6 months ago
Mere Use Of Words "Arbitration" Or "Arbitrator" In A Clause Won't Make It Arbitration Agreement : Supreme Court
2 years, 7 months ago
Arbitration Clause In Unstamped Charter Party Agreement Can Invoke Jurisdiction Under Section 9 Of A&C Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court
2 years, 10 months ago
Arbitration Court Reckoner : June & July 2021
3 years, 6 months ago
The Existential Conundrum Of An Arbitration Agreement
5 years, 11 months ago
Conflict And Conundrum: Section 26 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015
7 years ago
Conflict And Conundrum: Section 26 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015
7 years ago
Mere Non­-Filing Of Original/Certified Copy Of Arbitration Agreement Does Not Entail Dismissal Of Application For Reference: SC [Read Judgment]
8 years, 4 months ago
Significant Judgments On Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [May 2020 To July 2020]
28 years, 10 months ago

Discover Related