'For Publicity Purpose': Madras HC Imposes Rs 5K Costs, 2 Year Ban On Filing PILs For 'Misconceived' Challenge To Govt Retirement Age Policy
Live LawThe Madras High Court on Wednesday imposed costs to the tune of Rs 5000 on a petitioner who had who had challenged the State government's February 2021 decision to increase the retirement age for government officials to 60 years from the earlier 59 years. Additionally, the petitioner was also barred from filing any Public Interest Litigation petition for two years without obtaining the previous leave of the Court. A Bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice PD Audikesavalu remarked at the outset, "The petition is utterly misconceived and filed only for publicity purposes" The petitioner had contended before the Court that since unemployment is on the rise, increasing the retirement age would be detrimental to those who are seeking government jobs. "Additionally, the petitioner will not be entitled to bring any public interest litigation in this Court for a period of two years without obtaining previous express leave of the court in such regard," the Court added while dismissing the petition.