10 months, 3 weeks ago
Intermittent fasting might not be better than counting calories. Here’s why it still could work for you.
As weight-loss plans go, it’s easy to see the allure of intermittent fasting: Eat what you want, but only during certain windows of time — often just eight hours a day. But does time-restricted eating, a form of intermittent fasting, really help people shed pounds and boost health? Intermittent fasting is a meal strategy where people switch between fasting and eating on a regular schedule, defined as at least 14 hours with no food, Peterson said. Time-restricted eating, where people condense all of their eating into a daily window of 10 hours or less, is the most popular form of intermittent fasting. “Our data right now suggests that time-restricted eating isn’t any better or worse than cutting calories,” Peterson said.




Discover Related

3 months, 1 week ago
This type of fasting shows better health benefits

1 year, 1 month ago
Intermittent fasting could be risky for your heart: Study

1 year, 9 months ago
Compressing your eating day is as effective as counting calories, study finds

1 year, 11 months ago
Weight Loss: Is Intermittent Fasting An Effective Weight Loss Strategy?

2 years, 2 months ago
Beyond a diet fad: Fasting alters your genetic expression, experts say

2 years, 3 months ago
Reducing Calories May Be More Effective In Weight Loss Than Intermittent Fasting: Study

2 years, 3 months ago
Reducing calories OR Intermittent fasting? What is more effective for weight loss

3 years, 6 months ago