Supreme Court Sets Aside Directions Issued By P&H High Court Regarding Appearance Of Prosecution Witnesses
Live LawThe High Court, in its order passed on May 27, 2022, had adopted the directions issued by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Rambahor Saket and others vs State of M.P. and reiterated those guidelines as follows- The Supreme Court recently set aside the directions issued by the Punjab & Haryana High Court regarding issuance of summons to prosecution witnesses in a criminal trial. After framing of charges against the accused, summons be issued to the eyewitnesses or to those witnesses who are most material to prove the case of the prosecution If summons are returned unserved for whatever reasons, instead of wasting further time by resorting to the same process time and again, the next summons must be served through the office of the Superintendent of Police If the reasons given by the police in the report returning the summons unserved, reflect that the witnesses are unreachable/untraceable and that service cannot be effected on them on account of their non-availability and there is no prospect of them being found within a reasonable time, then the trial court must skip those witnesses and proceed to the next set of witnesses by issuing summons to them. While hearing the case, the High Court noted that the Trial Court had issued proclamation under Section 82 CrPC against two prosecution witnesses for failing to appear.