S.138 NI Act | Single Complaint For Dishonour Of Multiple Cheques Issued Qua Same Transaction Maintainable: Karnataka High Court
1 year, 1 month ago

S.138 NI Act | Single Complaint For Dishonour Of Multiple Cheques Issued Qua Same Transaction Maintainable: Karnataka High Court

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has held that a single complaint made under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, is maintainable for multiple cheques issued by the respondent/accused on the same cause of action. A single judge bench of Justice K Natarajan allowed the petition filed by complainant A Adinarayana Reddy and set aside the order dismissing the complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, against accused S Vijayalakshmi and another. Such being the case, instead of filing the multiple complaints, single complaint for dishonour of multiple cheques are maintainable.” The petitioner argued that as per section 219 of Cr.P.C, three criminal cases can be tried as one trial and for the same cause of action. The bench relied on Supreme Court judgment in the case of Damodar S Prabhu Vs Syed Babalal where it was held, "For instance, in the same transaction pertaining to a loan taken on an installment basis to be repaid in equated monthly installments, several cheques are taken which are dated for each monthly installment and upon the dishonour of each of such cheques, different complaints are being filed in different courts which may also have jurisdiction in relation to the complaint.

Complaint Filed Cheques Single Complaint Multiple Cheques  multiple  maintainable  cheques  complaint  filed  filing  s138  ni  single  issued  transaction  karnataka  cause  high  qua  court  accused

History of this topic

S. 138 NI Act | Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable If Complainant Is Party To Illegal Transaction: Orissa High Court
Trending News
1 week, 4 days ago

S. 138 NI Act | Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable If Complainant Is Party To Illegal Transaction: Orissa High Court

Live Law  

In an important decision, the Orissa High Court has held that a complainant cannot maintain a case for cheque bounce against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 if she herself is a party to illegal transaction, or in other words, if initially credit was given by the complainant for achieving an illegal purpose. Roy, Virender …

NI Act | Single Complaint For Dishonour Of More Than Three Cheques Maintainable If Covered By Consolidated Demand Notice: J&K High Court
2 weeks, 2 days ago

NI Act | Single Complaint For Dishonour Of More Than Three Cheques Maintainable If Covered By Consolidated Demand Notice: J&K High Court

Live Law  

Clarifying the legal position under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh has held that mere issuance or dishonour of a cheque does not give rise to a cause of action under Section 138 of the Act. While dismissing a petition challenging a complaint under the NI Act Justice Sanjay Dhar observed that …

Negotiable Instruments Act: All India Annual Digest 2024
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Negotiable Instruments Act: All India Annual Digest 2024

Live Law  

Director of the company not responsible for its day-to-day affairs cannot be held liable for dishonour of cheque. The court said, “It is pertinent to note that said Prabhakar is not even examined on behalf of the accused, nor any material like counterfoil or cheque issuing register is placed on record so as to establish that the cheque has been …

Criminal Liability For Cheque Dishonour Primarily On Drawer Company, Officers Are Held Liable Only If Section 141 Is Satisfied: Gujarat HC
1 month, 2 weeks ago

Criminal Liability For Cheque Dishonour Primarily On Drawer Company, Officers Are Held Liable Only If Section 141 Is Satisfied: Gujarat HC

Live Law  

Referring to various case laws on this aspect Justice Divyesh A. Joshi in his order said, “It is found out from the materials available on record that the applicant accused no.3 is not the signatory of the cheque and she has tendered her resignation way-back in the year 2013. As per the above-stated case laws, the liability under Section 141 …

Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Should Not Be Equated With Those Convicted Under Other Penal Statutes: Karnataka High Court
1 month, 4 weeks ago

Accused In Cheque Bounce Cases Should Not Be Equated With Those Convicted Under Other Penal Statutes: Karnataka High Court

Live Law  

the Courts while exercising its discretion at the time of passing the appropriate sentence in a given case, is entitled to use its discretionary power in awarding imprisonment or fine or with both. The Karnataka High Court recently observed that an accused who has suffered an order of conviction in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act …

Section 138 Of NI Act Warrants Strict Construction, Compliance With Proviso Clauses Is A Precondition Before Prosecution: J&K High Court
1 month, 4 weeks ago

Section 138 Of NI Act Warrants Strict Construction, Compliance With Proviso Clauses Is A Precondition Before Prosecution: J&K High Court

Live Law  

Quashing multiple complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 citing failure to adhere to mandatory conditions laid down in the Act the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has ruled that Section 138 of the Act being penal in nature, indisputably, warrants strict construction, hence making compliance with its proviso clauses,, and essential before initiating …

S. 138 NI Act | Complainant Can't Be Left Remediless Merely Because He Filed 'Premature' Complaint For Cheque Dishonour: Rajasthan HC
2 months, 4 weeks ago

S. 138 NI Act | Complainant Can't Be Left Remediless Merely Because He Filed 'Premature' Complaint For Cheque Dishonour: Rajasthan HC

Live Law  

“ From the aforesaid law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Yogendra Pratap Singh and Gajanand Burange, it is apparent that in a case where the complaint was filed before the expiry of a period of fifteen days stipulated in the notice which is required to be served upon the drawer of the cheque, the Court …

Cognizance Of Cheque Dishonour U/S 138 NI Act Can Be Taken Only Upon A Written Complaint: Jharkhand High Court Reiterates
4 months, 1 week ago

Cognizance Of Cheque Dishonour U/S 138 NI Act Can Be Taken Only Upon A Written Complaint: Jharkhand High Court Reiterates

Live Law  

While hearing a cheque bouncing case, the Jharkhand High Court has reaffirmed that cognizance of offences under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not require a report to the police nor empowers the court to direct the police to investigate the complaint. The court further clarified that under Section 142 of the NI Act the cognizance of an …

High Court Rejects Plea to Dismiss Murder Case, Says Prosecution Must Follow Due Process
4 months, 3 weeks ago

High Court Rejects Plea to Dismiss Murder Case, Says Prosecution Must Follow Due Process

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that a complaint for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act would be maintainable, notwithstanding the civil suit filed for recovery of the money. The court also held that initiating prosecution under Section 304-A (causing death by negligence) of the Indian Penal Code, against the owners/manager of a factory is …

High Court Rejects Plea to Dismiss Cheque Bounce Complaint
5 months ago

High Court Rejects Plea to Dismiss Cheque Bounce Complaint

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that a complaint for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act would be maintainable, even if a civil suit for recovery of the money is instituted. The court relied on the Apex court judgment in the case of D.PURUSHOTAMA REDDY v. K.SATEESH, (2008) 8 SCC 505, which held that two …

HC Can't Quash Cheque Dishonour Complaint Invoking S.482 CrPC When Complainant Hasn't Consented For Compounding: Supreme Court
7 months ago

HC Can't Quash Cheque Dishonour Complaint Invoking S.482 CrPC When Complainant Hasn't Consented For Compounding: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court reiterated that dishonour of cheque cases can be compounded under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act only with the consent of a complainant. In the present case, the High Court had compounded the offence, even though the appellants/ complainant had not consented, by invoking its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Act, in the absence of …

Negotiable Instruments Act | Court Can Compound Offences U/S 147 Even After Conviction: Himachal Pradesh High Court
7 months ago

Negotiable Instruments Act | Court Can Compound Offences U/S 147 Even After Conviction: Himachal Pradesh High Court

Live Law  

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has ruled that under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, offences can be compounded even after the recording of a conviction by the court. Justice Sandeep Sharma delivered this judgment while hearing a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, read with Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. …

S.138 NI Act - Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't Be Transferred At The Instance Of Accused : Supreme Court
9 months ago

S.138 NI Act - Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't Be Transferred At The Instance Of Accused : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court today observed that transfer of a case for the offence of dishonour of cheque under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 cannot be sought at the instance of the accused.The vacation bench of Justices AS Oka and Rajesh Bindal dismissed a transfer petition sought at the behest of the accused involved in the offence under …

Cheques Dishonored With Endorsements 'Insufficient Fund', 'Account Closed', 'Signature Mismatch' Attract S. 138 NI Act: Allahabad HC
10 months ago

Cheques Dishonored With Endorsements 'Insufficient Fund', 'Account Closed', 'Signature Mismatch' Attract S. 138 NI Act: Allahabad HC

Live Law  

The Allahabad High Court has observed that if the cheque is dishonoured and returned with the endorsements - case referred to drawer, instruction for stoppage of payment, exceeds arrangement, insufficient fund, signature differed or mismatch or account closed - then it will be sufficient for prima facie case for issuing process under Section 138 NI Act. A bench of Justice …

[Cheque Dishonour] Complainant Failed To Prove Cheque Was Issued Against Legally Enforceable Debt: Kerala High Court Acquits Accused
1 year ago

[Cheque Dishonour] Complainant Failed To Prove Cheque Was Issued Against Legally Enforceable Debt: Kerala High Court Acquits Accused

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has held that a complainant under the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot rely on the presumption that the holder of a negotiable instrument has paid consideration for it when his claim is inconsistent.It upheld the acquittal of the accused upon noting that the complainant in the present case had failed to prove that the cheque had been …

[S.138 NI Act] Must Examine Those With Direct Knowledge Of Transaction To Prove Allegations Of Cheque Dishonour: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Conviction
1 year, 1 month ago

[S.138 NI Act] Must Examine Those With Direct Knowledge Of Transaction To Prove Allegations Of Cheque Dishonour: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Conviction

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has stated that the prosecution has to examine a witness who had direct knowledge regarding the transaction, issuance and execution of the cheque to prove dishonour of the cheque. Justice A. Badharudeen observed that the examination of a witness who had no direct knowledge regarding the transaction or issuance of the cheque would be insufficient to …

S.138 NI Act | Proceedings For Cheque Dishonour Be Quashed Once Complainant Signs Deed Accepting Amount In Full & Final Settlement: Supreme Court
1 year, 2 months ago

S.138 NI Act | Proceedings For Cheque Dishonour Be Quashed Once Complainant Signs Deed Accepting Amount In Full & Final Settlement: Supreme Court

Live Law  

In a Criminal Appeal arising out of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Supreme Court held that once the settlement has been arrived at and the complainant has signed the deed accepting an amount in full and final settlement, the proceedings under this provision must be quashed. “Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the …

Cheque Dishonour | Onus On Accused To Prove Cheque Issued Towards Repayment Of Loan Was Misused By Complainant: Karnataka High Court
1 year, 3 months ago

Cheque Dishonour | Onus On Accused To Prove Cheque Issued Towards Repayment Of Loan Was Misused By Complainant: Karnataka High Court

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has held that in a cheque bounce case, the onus is on the accused to prove that the cheque was misused after it was issued to another person in lieu of a loan borrowed from them and thus did not amount to a legally enforceable debt. The primary contention of the accused was that the complainant …

S.138 NI Act | Availability Of Funds In Other Bank Accounts Not A Defence; Cheque Dishonour Relates To Specific Account: Supreme Court
1 year, 3 months ago

S.138 NI Act | Availability Of Funds In Other Bank Accounts Not A Defence; Cheque Dishonour Relates To Specific Account: Supreme Court

Live Law  

Recently, the Supreme Court categorically held that in proceedings initiated for bounced cheques, the defence that there are sufficient funds in the other bank accounts cannot be appreciated.“In a proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused cannot rely upon other bank accounts for. Recently, the Supreme Court categorically held that in proceedings initiated for bounced cheques, …

Cheque Dishonour | Wife Not Signatory, Cannot Be Held Liable For Cheque Signed & Given By Husband From Joint Account: Bombay High Court
1 year, 3 months ago

Cheque Dishonour | Wife Not Signatory, Cannot Be Held Liable For Cheque Signed & Given By Husband From Joint Account: Bombay High Court

Live Law  

The Bombay High Court recently quashed and set aside process and summons issued to a woman by the Magistrate's court in a cheque bounce case, noting that only her husband was a signatory to the cheque. The woman approached the High Court after the Magistrate issued process against her and her husband on November 27, 2019 u/s 138 of the …

s138 NI Act | Complainant Had No Right Over Property, Misused Cheques Issued To Grandfather: Karnataka High Court Upholds Accused's Acquittal
1 year, 3 months ago

s138 NI Act | Complainant Had No Right Over Property, Misused Cheques Issued To Grandfather: Karnataka High Court Upholds Accused's Acquittal

Live Law  

It held: It is admitted that neither her grandfather nor her maternal uncle has promised her to give. It appears that the cheques said to have been issued as security in respect of the sale transaction of property with Sri.H.V.Venkatappa Reddy have been misused by the complainant. The Karnataka High Court has dismissed an appeal upon noting that the appellant/complainant …

[Cheque Dishonour] Accused Must Take 'Probable Defence' To Rebut Adverse Presumption U/S 139 NI Act: Karnataka High Court Reiterates
1 year, 4 months ago

[Cheque Dishonour] Accused Must Take 'Probable Defence' To Rebut Adverse Presumption U/S 139 NI Act: Karnataka High Court Reiterates

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has reiterated that to rebut the presumption under Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act that cheque has been issued in discharge of a debt or liability, the accused must raise 'probable defence'. Faced with accused's mere denial regarding the existence of debt, Justice S Rachaiah remarked, “If the defence taken by the accused is not acceptable obviously …

S.142 NI Act | Third Party Cannot Prosecute Drawer For Dishonour Of Cheque: Kerala High Court
1 year, 6 months ago

S.142 NI Act | Third Party Cannot Prosecute Drawer For Dishonour Of Cheque: Kerala High Court

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court recently laid down that a third party cannot prosecute the drawer of cheque for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Perusing Section 142 of the Act which provides that no court shall take cognizance of. Perusing Section 142 of the Act which provides that no court shall take cognizance of …

[S.147 Negotiable Instruments Act] Offence Can Be Compounded Post-Conviction For Cheque Dishonour: Himachal Pradesh High Court
2 years ago

[S.147 Negotiable Instruments Act] Offence Can Be Compounded Post-Conviction For Cheque Dishonour: Himachal Pradesh High Court

Live Law  

The Himachal Pradesh High Court on Wednesday observed that courts while exercising power under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act are sufficiently empowered to proceed to compound an offence, even in cases where accused stands convicted. The moot question that fell for adjudication was as to whether after upholding the judgments of conviction and order of sentence passed by …

Cheque Dishonour- Additional Accused Cannot Be Impleaded After Expiry Of Limitation Period Under Sec 142 NI Act : Supreme Court
2 years, 4 months ago

Cheque Dishonour- Additional Accused Cannot Be Impleaded After Expiry Of Limitation Period Under Sec 142 NI Act : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court held that impleadment of additional accused subsequent to the filing of a cheque bounce complaint is not permissible once the limitation prescribed for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has expired.In this case, the High Court quashed a summoning order passed by a Magistrate in a cheque bounce complaint on …

Wife Cannot Be Made Accused in NI Act Case For Cheque Issued By Her Husband: Karnataka High Court
2 years, 4 months ago

Wife Cannot Be Made Accused in NI Act Case For Cheque Issued By Her Husband: Karnataka High Court

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has said proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be initiated against the wife for "dishonor of the cheque issued by her husband". A single judge bench of Justice M I Arun while allowing the petition filed by petitioner Veenashri and quashing the proceedings against her, said, "Petitioner cannot be made accused for …

S.138 NI Act | Director Cannot Be Prosecuted For Cheque Dishonour Without Arraying Company As Accused: Kerala High Court Reiterates
2 years, 4 months ago

S.138 NI Act | Director Cannot Be Prosecuted For Cheque Dishonour Without Arraying Company As Accused: Kerala High Court Reiterates

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has reiterated that when a cheque issued by a company is dishonored, prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against its Director shall not sustain if the company is not arrayed as an accused. Justice A. Badharudeen relying on the law laid down by the Apex Court, observed that prosecution against the director of …

Cheque Dishonour Case Convict Agrees To Pay After 10 Yrs Litigation; Supreme Court Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost For Wasting Judicial Time
2 years, 5 months ago

Cheque Dishonour Case Convict Agrees To Pay After 10 Yrs Litigation; Supreme Court Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost For Wasting Judicial Time

Live Law  

A party faced the ire of the Supreme Court for taking a cheque dishonour dispute to the level of apex level before agreeing to settle the matter with the complainant. The appellant had approached the Supreme Court challenging the concurrent orders of conviction passed by three courts against him for the offence of cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the …

No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act If Cheque Is Presented For Full Amount Without Endorsing Part Payment Made By Borrower : Supreme Court
2 years, 5 months ago

No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act If Cheque Is Presented For Full Amount Without Endorsing Part Payment Made By Borrower : Supreme Court

Live Law  

In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court on Tuesday held that no offence for dishonour of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is made out if the cheque is presented for the full amount without endorsing the part-payment made by the borrower after the issuance of the cheque.The Court held that the sum reflected on the cheque …

S.141 NI Act | Sole Proprietor Alone Can't Be Sued For Offence U/S 138, Sole Proprietary Concern Must Also Be Arrayed As Accused: P&H High Court
2 years, 6 months ago

S.141 NI Act | Sole Proprietor Alone Can't Be Sued For Offence U/S 138, Sole Proprietary Concern Must Also Be Arrayed As Accused: P&H High Court

Live Law  

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently held that when a cheque issued by a sole proprietary entity is dishonoured, it is necessary to array the proprietary concern as an accused, along with the sole proprietor. It observed, When the statutory signification assigned to a 'Company', does visibly cover not only any corporate body, but also covers a firm, or …

Cheques Dishonored Due To Stop Payment, Account Closed & Signature Mismatch, All Fall Within Ambit Of S.138 NI Act: J&K&L High Court
2 years, 7 months ago

Cheques Dishonored Due To Stop Payment, Account Closed & Signature Mismatch, All Fall Within Ambit Of S.138 NI Act: J&K&L High Court

Live Law  

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court recently reiterated that the provisions contained in Section 138 of the NI Act must be interpreted in a liberal manner so as to achieve the object for which the said provision has been enacted. Not only the cases of dishonour of cheques on account of insufficiency of funds or on account of …

Dishonour Of Cheque | S.27 General Clauses Act Presumes Service Of Statutory Notice In Favour Of Complainant: Punjab & Haryana High Court
2 years, 8 months ago

Dishonour Of Cheque | S.27 General Clauses Act Presumes Service Of Statutory Notice In Favour Of Complainant: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Live Law  

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently held that the service of notice upon the accused in cheque dishonour case cannot be denied in light of Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, which provides a presumption in favour of the complainant that the notice had been delivered.The bench comprising Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi was dealing with a revision petition …

Undisputed Signatures On The Cheque In Itself Are Not Sufficient For Conviction Under Section 138 Of NI Act: Punjab And Haryana High Court
2 years, 9 months ago

Undisputed Signatures On The Cheque In Itself Are Not Sufficient For Conviction Under Section 138 Of NI Act: Punjab And Haryana High Court

Live Law  

Punjab and Haryana High Court while dealing with an application under Section 378 Cr.P.C. for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment acquitting respondent in Complaint Case of 2012, held that undisputed signatures of the respondent on the cheque in itself are not sufficient for conviction under Section 138 of the Act. The trial court acquitted the respondent by …

S 138 NI Act: Treat Service Of Summons In One Complaint As Deemed Service In All Complaints Arising Out Of Same Transaction – Bombay High Court Issues Guidelines
3 years, 1 month ago

S 138 NI Act: Treat Service Of Summons In One Complaint As Deemed Service In All Complaints Arising Out Of Same Transaction – Bombay High Court Issues Guidelines

Live Law  

Pursuant to Supreme Court's directions issued last year regarding expeditious trials in cases filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act related cheque bouncing cases, the Bombay High Court has issued a circular setting out the following guidelines: 1.Magistrates trying offences under the NI Act convert a complaint under section 138 of the NI Act from summary trial to …

Joint Account Holder Who Is Not A Signatory To Cheque Shall Not Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 Of NI Act: Telangana High Court
3 years, 2 months ago

Joint Account Holder Who Is Not A Signatory To Cheque Shall Not Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 Of NI Act: Telangana High Court

Live Law  

In a case pertaining to dishonor of cheque, the Telangana High Court recently ruled that a joint account holder who is not a signatory to the disputed cheque shall not be prosecuted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1981. Relying on the Supreme Court ruling in Alka Khandu Avhad vs. Amar Syamprasad Mishra, Justice Shameem Akhtar held that a …

2021 Supreme Court Digest On Negotiable Instruments Act
3 years, 3 months ago

2021 Supreme Court Digest On Negotiable Instruments Act

Live Law  

Moratorium Under Section 14 IBC Covers Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Corporate Debtor For Cheque DishonourIn P Mohanraj and others v M/s Shah Brothers Ispat Ltd, the Supreme Court held that the declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code covers criminal proceedings for dishonour of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments. Moratorium …

Enlargement of Scope & Changed Judicial Contours of Section 138 NI Act Before SC's Ruling in M/s Laxmi Dyechem v. State of Gujarat
3 years, 9 months ago

Enlargement of Scope & Changed Judicial Contours of Section 138 NI Act Before SC's Ruling in M/s Laxmi Dyechem v. State of Gujarat

Live Law  

Prolegomenon to the Financial Transactions in Cheques: The law apropos negotiable instruments is the law of the commercial world legislated to facilitate the activities & transactions in trade and commerce and further, to bolster the efficacy of banking operations as well as to foster remittances through cheques to discharge debt obligations & liabilities eventually, not only inspiring confidence in creditors …

Section 138 NI Act : Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Views On Creation Of Additional Courts For Cheque Dishonour Case
4 years, 1 month ago

Section 138 NI Act : Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Views On Creation Of Additional Courts For Cheque Dishonour Case

Live Law  

The Supreme Court on Thursday sought the views of the Central Government on the creation of additional courts for the trial of cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.A bench comprising Chief Justice of India S A Bobde, Justices L Nageswara Rao and S Ravindra Bhat asked the Additional Solicitor General Vikramjit Banerjee if the …

Dishonour Of Cheques- Blank Cheque Would Attract Presumption U/s 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Admitted: Supreme Court
4 years, 1 month ago

Dishonour Of Cheques- Blank Cheque Would Attract Presumption U/s 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Admitted: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that even a blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when signatures are admitted by the accused.The bench comprising Justices NV Ramana, Surya Kant and Aniruddha Bose observed that 'reverse onus' clauses under Section 118 and Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act become operative once the signature. The …

Dishonour Of Cheque: Specific Averments To Be Mentioned, Not Enough To Allege That the Accused Was CEO Or Director Of Company: Delhi High Court
4 years, 3 months ago

Dishonour Of Cheque: Specific Averments To Be Mentioned, Not Enough To Allege That the Accused Was CEO Or Director Of Company: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has passed an order quashing criminal proceedings against the former CEO of a company in a cheque dishonour case, holding that as no specific allegations or averments against the former CEO, regarding her alleged role either in the transaction or in the conduct of business of the company were made out, the complaint against her was …

Decriminalization Of Dishonour Of Cheque And Fundamentals About Section 138 Of The N.I Act, 1881
4 years, 9 months ago

Decriminalization Of Dishonour Of Cheque And Fundamentals About Section 138 Of The N.I Act, 1881

Live Law  

The outbreak of the novel COVID-19 has an impact on almost all the sectors across the globe and economy being no exception. Further, in Sasseriyil Joseph v. Devassia, vide order dated 10.09.2001, while upholding the view taken by the High Court of Kerala, the Supreme Court held that the cheque in question was issued by the accused for debt which …

[138 NI Act] Accused Not Competent To Tender Evidence On Affidavit: Reiterates Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 4 months ago

[138 NI Act] Accused Not Competent To Tender Evidence On Affidavit: Reiterates Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that an accused facing trial under the provisions of Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be allowed to tender evidence on affidavit. Justice Surinder Gupta said, "the petitioner being an accused, who is facing trial in complaint under the provisions of Negotiable Instruments Act, is not competent to tender his evidence through affidavit and …

Complaint U/s 138 NI Act Maintainable Against Dishonour Of Cheque Issued Pursuant To Lok Adalat Award: SC [Read Order]
5 years, 4 months ago

Complaint U/s 138 NI Act Maintainable Against Dishonour Of Cheque Issued Pursuant To Lok Adalat Award: SC [Read Order]

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has observed that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of a cheque issued pursuant to the Lok Adalat award is maintainable. In appeal filed by the complainant, the Apex Court bench comprising of Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice MR Shah noted that in Lalit Kumar Sharma case, the cheque had not …

[Section 143 NI Act] Dispose Dishonor of Cheque Cases Within Six Months: Uttarakhand HC To Trial Courts [Read Order]
5 years, 5 months ago

[Section 143 NI Act] Dispose Dishonor of Cheque Cases Within Six Months: Uttarakhand HC To Trial Courts [Read Order]

Live Law  

Reinforcing the significance of speedy disposal of matters, the Uttarakhand High Court on Wednesday directed a trial court to dispose of the impugned dishonor of cheque proceedings within six months. Asserting that as per Section 143 of the NI Act, the matter should ideally have been disposed of within six months of filing, the Applicant prayed that directions in that …

Section 138 NI Act- No Provision For Consolidation Of Multiple Cases Arising Out Of Single Notice: SC [Read Order]
5 years, 6 months ago

Section 138 NI Act- No Provision For Consolidation Of Multiple Cases Arising Out Of Single Notice: SC [Read Order]

Live Law  

While refusing a plea to consolidate multiple cheque bounce cases against the accused which emanated from a single notice, the Supreme Court has observed that there is no provision of consolidation of cases in the Code of Criminal Procedure.Four separate complaints were filed against the accused after four cheques allegedly issued by him to the complainant bounced. While refusing a …

Dishonour Of Cheques: 14 Latest Supreme Court Judgments
5 years, 9 months ago

Dishonour Of Cheques: 14 Latest Supreme Court Judgments

Live Law  

Section 148 NI Act Retrospective In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as amended, shall be applicable in respect of the appeals against the order of conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Complainant Need Not Prove Source Of Fund, Once Section 139 Presumption Is Drawn The …

Sec.138 NI Act - Complaint Not Maintainable Against Trustees For Dishonour Of Cheque : Kerala HC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 9 months ago

Sec.138 NI Act - Complaint Not Maintainable Against Trustees For Dishonour Of Cheque : Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The High Court of Kerala has held that no prosecution is possible against a trust and its trustees for dishonour of cheque invoking section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Since the common purpose of the "Trust" is not to achieve benefit to the trustees, the "Trust" cannot be said to be an "association of persons / body of …

Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Maintainable Against Dishonour Of Cheques Issued In Pursuance Of Agreement For Sale: SC [Read Judgment]
6 years ago

Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Maintainable Against Dishonour Of Cheques Issued In Pursuance Of Agreement For Sale: SC [Read Judgment]

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has observed that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is maintainable when there is dishonour of cheques issued under and in pursuance of the agreement to sell. The accused moved the High Court which quashed the complaint holding that cheques had not been issued for creating any liability or debt but for the …

Dishonour Of Cheque: Presence Of Complainant Not Required To Take Cognizance Of Offence, Holds Kerala HC
6 years, 1 month ago

Dishonour Of Cheque: Presence Of Complainant Not Required To Take Cognizance Of Offence, Holds Kerala HC

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has held that the presence of the complainant is not necessary to take cognizance of a cheque bouncing case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881,if the complaint is accompanied by an affidavit and all necessary documents are in order. The court first examined Section 145 of the NI Act, which was introduced via …

Discover Related