Multiple Complaints With Same Grievance Cannot Be Maintained: Delhi State Commission Dismisses Complaint Against Parsvnath Developers
3 months, 2 weeks ago

Multiple Complaints With Same Grievance Cannot Be Maintained: Delhi State Commission Dismisses Complaint Against Parsvnath Developers

Live Law  

The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and Ms. Pinki dismissed a complaint against Parsvnath Developers and directed the complainant to instead join the ongoing class suit before the National Commission. Observations by the State Commission The State Commission observed that the developer raised an objection, stating that some allottees of the project filed a complaint with the National Commission, which granted permission for a class action under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act. In this case, since the National Commission had granted permission for the class action complaint in 2016, hence, the individual complaint filed later in 2021 could not continue. The State Commission dismissed the complaint and directed the complainant to join the existing class action complaint.

Case State Commission Complainant Complaint Developer Parsvnath Developers  commission  developers  complainant  multiple  permission  case  delhi  rs  dismisses  grievance  developer  complaint  class  maintained  complaints  state  parsvnath

History of this topic

Complainant Not Bound To Accept Possession After Unreasonable Delay: Delhi State Commission Holds Raheja Developers Liable
2 months, 3 weeks ago

Complainant Not Bound To Accept Possession After Unreasonable Delay: Delhi State Commission Holds Raheja Developers Liable

Live Law  

The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and Ms. Pinki held Raheja Developers liable for deficiency in service and ruled that buyers are not bound to accept the possession after unreasonable delay by the builder. Not getting an appropriate response, the complainant also filed a case before the State Commission of Delhi. Observations by the State Commission …

Consumer Complaints Must Be Lodged Within Two Years From Date Of Cause Of Action: Delhi State Commission
8 months, 1 week ago

Consumer Complaints Must Be Lodged Within Two Years From Date Of Cause Of Action: Delhi State Commission

Live Law  

The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and Ms. Pinki, dismissed a complaint against Oriental Insurance Ltd., citing the presence of a limitation clause. It was further held that consumer complaints are time-barred and need to be filed within two years from the date of the action unless sufficient reasons are present. Observations by the State Commission …

Delhi State Commission Dismisses Complaint Based On Involvement Of Complex Questions Of Law And Fact, Sets Complainant At Liberty To Approach Civil Court
1 year, 1 month ago

Delhi State Commission Dismisses Complaint Based On Involvement Of Complex Questions Of Law And Fact, Sets Complainant At Liberty To Approach Civil Court

Live Law  

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi bench comprising Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, Ms Pinki and Mr J.P. Agrawal dismissed a complaint against M/s Angel Broking Limited and gave the option to the Complainant to approach the appreciate civil court. The State Commission observed that the complaint involved complex questions of law and fact, which are better suited for resolution …

Discover Related