Cairn tax dispute brings shortcomings in India's economic policy to the fore
FirstpostRevenue maximization can never be the goal of economic policy. India’s dispute with Cairn Energy is the direct consequence of the disastrous retrospective tax amendment law, introduced by the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government, and accepted by the Narendra Modi regime. The British oil major got a notice from India’s Income Tax department in January 2014, asking for Rs 10,247 crore pertaining to the company’s 2006 reorganisation in which Cairn UK had transferred around 10 percent of its stake in Cairn India Holdings to Cairn India. Cairn Energy said on Thursday that “a Paris court had accepted its petition that Indian state-owned assets in the city worth over 20 million euros be frozen, claiming a significant win in its campaign to force the Indian government to pay Cairn billion-dollar damages in a protracted tax dispute,” Reuters reported. It said: “Our strong preference remains an agreed, amicable settlement with the government of India to draw this matter to a close.” While claiming to “vigorously defend its case,” the government also said, “Constructive discussions have been held and the government remains open for an amicable solution to the dispute within the country’s legal framework.” An amicable solution is what the government should aim for.