Speaking to the State for citizens
Hindustan TimesThat the executive needed to be reminded of its role is worrying, albeit not surprising. In recent years, especially, partly from a desire to appear decisive and responsive, and partly to pander to the public’s demand for immediate retributive justice, several state governments have started subscribing to what they popularly term “bulldozer justice”, the demolition of the properties of those accused of crimes. On Wednesday, following an order in September when it said it would issue guidelines for demolitions, the Supreme Court did so, specifying the details of the process that needs to be followed while demolishing even those properties that violate some laws or encroach on public land. The bench was critical of the approach of the state governments, pointing out that the selective nature of demolitions made their actions appear retributory: Many of the victims were in the State’s crosshairs for their political, and worse, in some cases, religious beliefs. Understandably, the apex court has held that such action “reminds one of a lawless state of affairs, where ‘might was right’”.