Inside climate activists’ uneasy relationship with ‘net-zero’
In the premier episode of Apple TV's climate show, Extrapolations, it's 2037 and Earth is in turmoil. Although the concept of global net-zero is rooted in climate science, today's carbon neutrality pledges from individual governments and corporations have been criticized in some quarters as a "con," because they allow polluters to continue emitting greenhouse gases. "Global net-zero is nonnegotiable if you're serious about climate targets," said Sam Fankhauser, a professor of climate change economics and policy at the University of Oxford. Levin said polluters too often use poorly regulated and opaque "junk offsets" to delay the absolute emissions reductions required to combat climate change. "While real zero is a valuable guiding light, net-zero is still a worthy and necessary goal," said Jackie Ennis, a policy analyst for the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Discover Related

'Net zero emissions': What does it actually mean today?

What is ‘Net Zero’, anyway? A short history of a monumental concept

UK failing to meet net zero targets, government’s own climate watchdog warns

More companies setting 'net-zero' climate targets, but few have credible plans: Report

What’s Needed to Reach Net-Zero This Century, According to the IEA

Climate change, emissions, net-zero to remain in focus at UNGA 2022

Don’t ditch net zero, UK’s top businesses warn Tory candidates

India pledges new climate crisis goal: Net zero by 2070

The Climate Change Dictionary: What Is Carbon Net-Zero?

Is the idea of net zero realistic, or just a dangerous trap?
