CIRP Withdrawal Cannot Be Allowed Unless Application Is Filed By Applicant Who Initiates Section 7 Application: NCLAT
22 hours, 22 minutes ago

CIRP Withdrawal Cannot Be Allowed Unless Application Is Filed By Applicant Who Initiates Section 7 Application: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Barun Mitra has held that CIRP cannot be withdrawn under section 12A read with Regulation 30A unless application for withdrawal is filed by the applicant who initiated the CIRP. Based on the above, the tribunal observed that “we are of the view that Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in rejecting the prayer of the Appellant in IA No.2241 of 2024 for recall of the order dated 08.10.2021.” In Glass Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran the Supreme Court has held that “Regulation 30A provides that in cases where the application for withdrawal is moved before the constitution of the CoC, the IRP shall submit the application to the NCLT on behalf of the applicant within three days of receipt.” “Regulations 30A and deal with the situation where the CoC has already been constituted. They provide that the CoC shall consider the application within seven days of receipt, and subsequently, if the application is approved by the CoC with a ninety-percent voting share, the RP must submit the application with the approval to the NCLT within three days of the approval.” While applying the above ratio to the facts of the present case, it opined that Section 7 Application has been filed by Respondent Nos.6 to 9 and unless an Application is filed by the Applicant, who has initiated Section 7 Application, compliance of Section 12A read with Section 30A, cannot be made. In a case where finding is returned within the meaning of Section 65, the Adjudicating Authority can very well exercise its inherent jurisdiction to close such CIRP proceedings.” The tribunal further noted that IA No.1238 of 2022, in which averments and pleadings have been made within the meaning of Section 65 of the IBC, still pending consideration before the Adjudicating Authority and while hearing the said Application, the Adjudicating Authority directed for stay of voting on the Resolution Plan.

History of this topic

CIRP Withdrawal Cannot Be Allowed Unless Application Is Filed By Applicant Who Initiates S.7 Application: NCLAT
2 days, 15 hours ago
CIRP Can't Be Extended Beyond 330 Days U/S. 12(3) Of IBC Absence Of “Exceptional Circumstances”: NCLAT
5 days, 14 hours ago
Fraudulent Initiation Of CIRP Can Be Set Aside By NCLAT While Hearing Appeal U/S 61: NCLAT New Delhi
3 weeks, 3 days ago
Once Plausibility Of Pre-Existing Dispute Is Established, Application U/S 9 Of IBC Must Be Rejected: NCLAT
3 weeks, 4 days ago
Filing Petition U/S 10 Of IBC Subsequent To Action Taken Under SARFAESI Act Cannot Be Termed Malicious Or Fraudulent: NCLAT
1 month ago
Section 19(2) Application Can Be Preferred For Effective Conduct Of CIRP Despite Challenge To Admission Of CIRP: NCLAT
1 month, 1 week ago
Adjudicating Authority Cannot Enter Into Merits At S. 95 Application Stage Before Report Of RP Is Submitted U/S 99 Of IBC: NCLAT
1 month, 1 week ago
NCLT Kolkata: Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA Won't Bar Admission Of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC
8 months, 3 weeks ago
NCLT Mumbai Allows Withdrawal Of Liquidation Application On Receipt Of Resolution Plan
10 months, 2 weeks ago
IBC | Settlement In Section 7 Or Dropping Of Sec. 66 Proceedings Does Not Automatically End Proceedings Under Section 43: NCLT Mumbai
10 months, 4 weeks ago
NCLAT Chennai: Not Open To NCLT To Reject Withdrawl Application U/S 12A, Where 90% Voting Share Of CoC Exists
1 year, 2 months ago
IBC - No Bar To Withdraw Admitted CIRP Application Before Constitution Of Committee Of Creditors : Supreme Court
2 years, 2 months ago
CIRP Cannot Be Initiated Solely For Interest Amount, If The Principal Amount Is Discharged: NCLT Delhi
2 years, 6 months ago
Application Intentionally Withdrawn By Applicant And Subsequently Filed On The Same Transaction Will Be Barred By Res Judicata. NCLT Kochi
2 years, 11 months ago
The 'Adjudicating Authority' Is Not A 'Court Of Law' And 'CIRP' Is Not Synonymous To 'Litigation': NCLAT
2 years, 11 months ago
Money Decree/Certificate Of Recovery In Favour Of Financial Creditor Gives Fresh Cause Of Action To Initiate CIRP U/s 7 IBC: Supreme Court
3 years, 4 months ago
Bar Under Section 10A IBC Against Initiation Of CIRP Retrospective; Applies To Applications Filed From 25 March 2020
3 years, 10 months ago
NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order Dismissing Initiation Of CIRP Against Mittal Corp
4 years, 3 months ago
[IBC] Limitation Period For CIRP Application Is Three Years From The Date Of Default: SC [Read Judgment]
4 years, 4 months ago

Discover Related