Supreme Court says certificate not mandatory for making electronic evidence judicially admissible
7 years, 1 month ago

Supreme Court says certificate not mandatory for making electronic evidence judicially admissible

Firstpost  

The Supreme Court has held that the requirement of a certificate to make an electronic evidence admissible is not mandatory “wherever interest of justice so justifies”. New Delhi: In the age of digitisation and increasing reliance on computerised records in judicial proceedings, the Supreme Court has held that the requirement of a certificate to make an electronic evidence admissible is not mandatory “wherever interest of justice so justifies”. Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act says that electronic records needs to be certified by a person occupying a responsible official position for being admissible as evidence in any court proceedings. The bench said that section 65 B of Evidence Act is a procedural provision and if the electronic evidence is “authentic and relevant” the same can certainly be admitted, subject to the satisfaction of the court and it may depend on situation such as “whether the person producing such evidence is in a position to furnish certificate under Section 65B”.

History of this topic

Karnataka High Court Issues Notice To Centre On PIL To Appoint Adequate Number Of Experts To Examine And Certify Electronic Evidence
1 month, 3 weeks ago
S. 65-B Of Indian Evidence Act Only Pertains To Production Of Electronic Records, Not Physical Documents: Jharkhand High Court Clarifies
8 months ago
How To Fulfill Requirements Of Admissibility Of Electronic Evidence Under Bhartiya Sakshay Adhiniyam, 2023?
8 months, 3 weeks ago
S.65B Evidence Act Certificate Can Be Produced At Any Stage Of Trial: Supreme Court Allows Prosecution Plea In 2008 Bangalore Blasts Case
1 year, 4 months ago
Court Can Allow Prosecution To Produce Certificate U/S 65-B (4) Evidence Act At A Later Stage During Trial: Allahabad High Court
2 years, 9 months ago
Production Of Certificate U/S 65B(4) Evidence Act Not Necessary To Obtain Voice Sample Of Accused For Further Probe: PH High Court
2 years, 11 months ago
Pride and Prejudice of Certificate Under Section 65B(4), Indian Evidence Act 1872
4 years, 5 months ago
The Law Of Electronic Evidence,The Error Continues
4 years, 6 months ago
Certificate Not Necessary Before Producing Electronic Evidence in Court: SC Clarifies Law
4 years, 7 months ago
[Column] 'Plain Is Fine: Law, Legislation, And Language' , By Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu
4 years, 7 months ago
[Breaking] Certificate Under Section 65B(4) Evidence Act Is A Condition Precedent To The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: SC [Read Judgment]
4 years, 8 months ago
Digitalisation Of Court Proceedings
4 years, 10 months ago
Is Requirement Of Certificate U/s 65-B(4) Evidence Act Mandatory for Production Of Electronic Evidence? SC Refers To Larger Bench [Read Order]
5 years, 7 months ago
The Legality And Admissibility Of Electronic Signatures In The Modern World– A Look At The Laws In India
5 years, 10 months ago
SC Clarifies on Electronic Evidence admissibility: No certificate needed in certain cases
7 years, 1 month ago
Party Not In Possession Of Device From Which Electronic Document Is Produced Need Not Produce Sec. 65B Certificate: SC [Read Order]
7 years, 1 month ago
Party Not In Possession Of Device From Which Electronic Document Is Produced Need Not Produce Sec. 65B Certificate: SC [Read Order]
7 years, 1 month ago
Electronic Evidence: If Judgment in ‘Anvar Case’ Is Applied Retrospectively, It Would Adversely Affect Administration Of Justice: SC [Read Judgment]
7 years, 8 months ago
Electronic Records Admitted By Trial Court Without Objection Can’t Be Challenged At Appellate Stages If The Objection Relates To Mode Of Proof: SC [Read Judgment]
7 years, 8 months ago
Primary Evidence Of Electronic Record U/S 62 Of Evidence Act Is Admissible Without Compliance With Conditions U/S 65(B): Madras HC [Read Order]
7 years, 9 months ago
Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]
8 years, 3 months ago
Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]
8 years, 3 months ago
BREAKING; General Law relating to Secondary Evidence is not applicable to Electronic Evidence; Ratio in Parliament Attack Case [State v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru (2005)11 SCC 600] overruled to..
13 years, 10 months ago

Discover Related