
Supreme Court says certificate not mandatory for making electronic evidence judicially admissible
FirstpostThe Supreme Court has held that the requirement of a certificate to make an electronic evidence admissible is not mandatory “wherever interest of justice so justifies”. New Delhi: In the age of digitisation and increasing reliance on computerised records in judicial proceedings, the Supreme Court has held that the requirement of a certificate to make an electronic evidence admissible is not mandatory “wherever interest of justice so justifies”. Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act says that electronic records needs to be certified by a person occupying a responsible official position for being admissible as evidence in any court proceedings. The bench said that section 65 B of Evidence Act is a procedural provision and if the electronic evidence is “authentic and relevant” the same can certainly be admitted, subject to the satisfaction of the court and it may depend on situation such as “whether the person producing such evidence is in a position to furnish certificate under Section 65B”.
History of this topic

Karnataka High Court Issues Notice To Centre On PIL To Appoint Adequate Number Of Experts To Examine And Certify Electronic Evidence
Live Law
S. 65-B Of Indian Evidence Act Only Pertains To Production Of Electronic Records, Not Physical Documents: Jharkhand High Court Clarifies
Live Law
How To Fulfill Requirements Of Admissibility Of Electronic Evidence Under Bhartiya Sakshay Adhiniyam, 2023?
Live Law
S.65B Evidence Act Certificate Can Be Produced At Any Stage Of Trial: Supreme Court Allows Prosecution Plea In 2008 Bangalore Blasts Case
Live Law
Court Can Allow Prosecution To Produce Certificate U/S 65-B (4) Evidence Act At A Later Stage During Trial: Allahabad High Court
Live Law
Production Of Certificate U/S 65B(4) Evidence Act Not Necessary To Obtain Voice Sample Of Accused For Further Probe: PH High Court
Live Law
Pride and Prejudice of Certificate Under Section 65B(4), Indian Evidence Act 1872
Live Law
The Law Of Electronic Evidence,The Error Continues
Live Law
Certificate Not Necessary Before Producing Electronic Evidence in Court: SC Clarifies Law
News 18![[Column] 'Plain Is Fine: Law, Legislation, And Language' , By Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Column] 'Plain Is Fine: Law, Legislation, And Language' , By Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu
Live Law![[Breaking] Certificate Under Section 65B(4) Evidence Act Is A Condition Precedent To The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Breaking] Certificate Under Section 65B(4) Evidence Act Is A Condition Precedent To The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Digitalisation Of Court Proceedings
Live Law![Is Requirement Of Certificate U/s 65-B(4) Evidence Act Mandatory for Production Of Electronic Evidence? SC Refers To Larger Bench [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Is Requirement Of Certificate U/s 65-B(4) Evidence Act Mandatory for Production Of Electronic Evidence? SC Refers To Larger Bench [Read Order]
Live Law
The Legality And Admissibility Of Electronic Signatures In The Modern World– A Look At The Laws In India
Live Law
SC Clarifies on Electronic Evidence admissibility: No certificate needed in certain cases
India TV News![Party Not In Possession Of Device From Which Electronic Document Is Produced Need Not Produce Sec. 65B Certificate: SC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Party Not In Possession Of Device From Which Electronic Document Is Produced Need Not Produce Sec. 65B Certificate: SC [Read Order]
Live Law![Party Not In Possession Of Device From Which Electronic Document Is Produced Need Not Produce Sec. 65B Certificate: SC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Party Not In Possession Of Device From Which Electronic Document Is Produced Need Not Produce Sec. 65B Certificate: SC [Read Order]
Live Law![Electronic Evidence: If Judgment in ‘Anvar Case’ Is Applied Retrospectively, It Would Adversely Affect Administration Of Justice: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Electronic Evidence: If Judgment in ‘Anvar Case’ Is Applied Retrospectively, It Would Adversely Affect Administration Of Justice: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Electronic Records Admitted By Trial Court Without Objection Can’t Be Challenged At Appellate Stages If The Objection Relates To Mode Of Proof: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Electronic Records Admitted By Trial Court Without Objection Can’t Be Challenged At Appellate Stages If The Objection Relates To Mode Of Proof: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Primary Evidence Of Electronic Record U/S 62 Of Evidence Act Is Admissible Without Compliance With Conditions U/S 65(B): Madras HC [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Primary Evidence Of Electronic Record U/S 62 Of Evidence Act Is Admissible Without Compliance With Conditions U/S 65(B): Madras HC [Read Order]
Live Law![Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Electronic Record Inadmissible If Section 65B Certificate Isn’t Produced: SC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![BREAKING; General Law relating to Secondary Evidence is not applicable to Electronic Evidence; Ratio in Parliament Attack Case [State v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru (2005)11 SCC 600] overruled to..](/static/images/error.jpg)
BREAKING; General Law relating to Secondary Evidence is not applicable to Electronic Evidence; Ratio in Parliament Attack Case [State v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru (2005)11 SCC 600] overruled to..
Live LawDiscover Related







![[Prevention Of Corruption Act] CBI Can File Final Report Even If No Offence Is Revealed During Probe: Kerala High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)















![Supreme Court Annual Digest 2024: Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act [UAPA]](/static/images/error.jpg)




















