
AO & PCIT Failed To Consider Balance Of Convenience And Irreparable Injury While Deciding The Stay Application: Delhi High Court
Live LawThe Delhi High Court bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma has held that neither the Assessing Officer nor the Principal Commissioners of Income Tax have considered the three basic principles, i.e., the prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury, while deciding the stay application. The petitioner company/assessee filed an application for a stay of demand under Section 220 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2019-20 on the ground that the appeal filed by the petitioner before the CIT against the additions made by the department was pending adjudication. "It is clarified that till the stay applications filed by the Petitioner are not decided, no coercive action shall be taken by the Respondents against the Petitioner in pursuance to the demands arising out of the orders dated 31st March, 2022 and 13th December, 2021," the court said. Case Title: Seven Seas Hospitality Private Limited Versus PCIT Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 467 Dated: 2.05.2022 Counsel For Petitioner: Advocate Salil Kapoor with Advocate Tarun Chanana Counsel For Respondent: Senior Standing Counsel Vibhooti Malhotra
History of this topic

High Court Within Whose Jurisdiction AO Passes Assessment Order Has Jurisdiction To Entertain Appeal U/S 260A Income Tax Act: Delhi HC
Live Law
Delhi HC Rejects Income Tax Director's Appeal U/S 19 Contempt Of Courts Act, Says Appeal Maintainable Only If Order Imposes Punishment
Live Law
Delhi High Court Disallows Income Tax Dept From Adjusting Stayed Demand Towards Previous Refund Due To Nokia
Live Law
Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed As Not Maintainable On Account Of Non-Payment Of Requisite Fee: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Live Law
Entry Made In Dispatch Register Is Not Primary Evidence To Prove Service Of Notice On Assessee: Orissa High Court
Live Law
Word 'Approved' By PCCIT For Reopening Of Assessment Not Enough, Reasons Necessary, Delhi High Court
Live Law
'HC Was Not Right' : Supreme Court Questions Delhi HC For Asking Congress To Approach ITAT To Stay Tax Recovery
Live Law
AO Can't Disregard ITAT's Direction To Re-examine Issue By Referring To CBDT Circular: Delhi High Court
Live Law
AO Can't Review Its Own Order: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Delhi HC dismisses Congress’ plea in tax dues case
The Hindu
Section 9 Not Res Judicata For Section 17 Application When Withdrawal Is Conditional: Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 37(2)(B) Application
Live Law
Reopening Of Income Tax Assessments : Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere With Delhi High Court's Guidelines To Tax Dept
Live Law
Reassessment Proceedings, Senior Officers Like ACIT, PCIT Expected To Apply Mind; Delhi High Court
Live Law
Person Can't Be Summoned For Non-Compliance Of Maintenance Order Under Section 31 Of Domestic Violence Act: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Employee Can’t Be Penalised For Non-Deposit Of TDS By Employer: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Delhi High Court Limits Adjustment Of Tax Refunds Against Disputed Demands At 20%
Live Law
Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 6 August To 12 August, 2023
Live Law
Mere Pendency Of An Appeal Would Not Detract From The Excise Duty Refund Demand: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Income Tax Demand On OYO For 1,140 Cr: Delhi High Court Directs CIT To Give Personal Hearing
Live Law
Appearance Of AR Not Enough For Presuming Service On Assessee Under S. 292BB Of ITA: Orissa High Court
Live Law
Reassessment Notice after 4 Years should have the Sanction Of PCIT: Bombay High Court
Live Law
CBDT Circulars Can’t Prescribe Limitation To Decide Application For Compounding Of Offence: Bombay High Court
Live Law![[Senior Citizens Act] What Are The Factors Appellate Authority Needs To Consider While Dealing With Application Seeking Stay On Eviction Order? Delhi High Court Answers](/static/images/error.jpg)
[Senior Citizens Act] What Are The Factors Appellate Authority Needs To Consider While Dealing With Application Seeking Stay On Eviction Order? Delhi High Court Answers
Live Law
PCIT Failed To Recorded Satisfaction Under His Signature Prior To Issuance Of Reassessment Notice By AO: Allahabad High Court
Live Law
NCLAT Delhi Allows Appeal Re-Filed After 197 Days Of Delay, Subject To Cost Of Rs.10,000 Payable To Respondent
Live Law
Recovery Of Tax Dues Of A Company From Its Directors Under Section 179 Of Income Tax Act, Cannot Be Invoked Casually: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Delhi High Court Quashes Assessment Order For Not Giving Opportunity To File Objection To SCN
Live Law
Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Order Issued Without Considering The Reply Filed By The Assessee
Live Law
No Opportunity Of Personal Hearing Granted To Taxpayer: Delhi High Court Quashes Assessment Order
Live Law
If Principles Of Natural Justice Are Violated, Writ Remedy Is Available Despite Statutory Appeal: Delhi High Court
Live Law![Assessment Of Interim Maintenance U/S 125 Of CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Evaluation: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Assessment Of Interim Maintenance U/S 125 Of CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Evaluation: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law
Delhi HC dismisses Vodafone plea for tax refund of over ₹4759 crore
Live Mint![Delhi HC Sets Aside ITAT Orders In NDTV's Prannoy Roy's Tax Case [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Delhi HC Sets Aside ITAT Orders In NDTV's Prannoy Roy's Tax Case [Read Order]
Live Law![Madras HC Rejects Plea For Filing I-T Return Sans Aadhaar Number, Enrolment ID [Read Order]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Madras HC Rejects Plea For Filing I-T Return Sans Aadhaar Number, Enrolment ID [Read Order]
Live Law
11 Factors to be considered by the Court while awarding interim Maintenance
Live Law![‘Procedure’ is meant only to facilitate the administration of justice and not to defeat the same: Supreme Court [Read the Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
‘Procedure’ is meant only to facilitate the administration of justice and not to defeat the same: Supreme Court [Read the Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related











































![Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: February 2025 [Citations 119- 251]](/static/images/error.jpg)




