'No Civil Or Criminal Proceedings Against Acts Done By Judicial Officers In Discharge Of Official Duties': Karnataka HC Quashes Complaint Against Magistrate [Read Order]
Live LawThe Karnataka High Court on Wednesday quashed and set aside a private complaint lodged against a Judicial Officer by one C M Manjunath. The Court referred to the Judges Act 1985 and Section 77 of the Indian Penal Code to quash the complaint filed in respect of certain statements alleged to have been made by the judicial officer against the complainant. The court had by an earlier order stayed the private complaint registered under sections 166, 205, 120 211, 219, 499 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, against the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amicus Curiae Vikram Huilgol had submitted that the 2nd Respondent, being a judicial officer in Karnataka, is a "judge" who is entitled to protection under Section 3 of the Judges Protection Act and Section 77 of the IPC. The court had while staying the proceedings against the judicial officer had observed "Prima facie it appears to us that impugned complaint so far as respondent 2 is concerned is not maintainable in view of protection granted under provisions of Judge Act 1985, and section 77 of Indian Penal Code." Manjunath had filed a complaint on the administrative side addressed to the Chief Justice making certain grievances against the Judicial Officer, about the alleged statements made by the officer during remand proceedings.