Forensic Evidence And Right To Privacy
Live LawThe Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is one of the oldest legislations in our country. A three judge bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mukesh and Anr v. State observed that DNA technology as a part of Forensic Science and scientific discipline not only provides guidance to investigation but also supplies the Court accrued information about the tending features of identification of criminals. The Supreme Court and the various High Courts have time and again trusted the opinion of experts on DNA test and relied heavily even while granting death penalty. In Dipanwita Roy v. Ronobroto Roy, the Supreme Court held that DNA testing is the most legitimate and scientifically perfect means to establish the assertion of infidelity. Balancing Accused's Right To Privacy And Victim's Right To Get A Fair Trial In Dipanwita Roy v. Ronobroto Roy, the Supreme Court held that when there is apparent conflict between the right to privacy of a person not to submit himself forcibly to medical examination and duty of the court to reach the truth, the court must exercise its discretion only after balancing the interests of the parties and on due consideration whether for a just decision in the matter, DNA test is eminently needed.