Order XXI Rule 34 CPC Cannot Be Diluted; Execution Court Has Duty To Invite Objections From Judgment Debtor To Draft Document/Deed : Supreme Court
3 years ago

Order XXI Rule 34 CPC Cannot Be Diluted; Execution Court Has Duty To Invite Objections From Judgment Debtor To Draft Document/Deed : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that the provisions of Order XXI Rule 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot be diluted and it has to invite objections from the judgment debtor to the draft deed/document submitted by the decree holder. The court noted the scheme of Order XXI Rule 34 as follows: -If the judgment debtor neglects or refuses to obey the decree, the decree holder is to prepare a draft of the document. It is all of this which is sought to be avoided by bringing clarity and precision and execution must be in conformity with the adjudication contained in the decree" Headnotes Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order XXI Rule 34 - It is the duty of the court to cause the draft to be served upon the judgment debtor and to apply its mind and to make alterations in the draft, if needed, when objections are filed - It will be thereafter that the decree holder is to deliver it to the court with the alterations if any made by the court, on proper stamp paper, if required and the execution of the document is effected by the court or the officer appointed. Summary - Appeal against High Court judgment which upheld the procedure adopted by the Execution Court that did not invite objections under Order XXI Rule 34 from Judgment debtor to draft sale deed produced by Decree holder - Allowed - Clearly contravenes the salutary provisions of Order XXI Rule 34 - The objections of the appellant to the draft sale deed to be considered.

History of this topic

Section 47 CPC Applications Raising Property Rights After Passing Of Decree To Be Treated As Application Under Order 21 Rule 97 : Supreme Court
1 week, 6 days ago
Section 47 CPC Applications Raising Property Rights After Passing Of Decree To Be Treated As Application Under Order 21 Rule 97 : Supreme Court
1 week, 6 days ago
Sale Of Judgment Debtor's Whole Property Impermissible When Sale Of Part Property Can Satisfy Decree: Supreme Court
10 months ago
Order XXI CPC | Failure To Raise Objections Before Proclamation Of Sale Not Bar To Challenge An Irregular Sale: Kerala High Court
1 year, 6 months ago
Order XXI Rule 90 CPC | Stranger To Suit Can Challenge Sale If Entitled To Share In Rateable Distribution Of Assets: Kerala High Court
1 year, 7 months ago
Stage Of Defendant Producing Documents Under Order VIII Rule 1A(3) CPC Distinct From Tendering Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 25: Sikkim High Court
2 years ago
Is Order XXV Rule 1(1) CPC Mandatory? Delhi High Court Larger Bench To Decide
2 years, 2 months ago
Execution Court Should Attach The Debt Under Order XXI Rule 46 CPC Before Proceeding Against Garnishee Under Order XXI Rule 46A CPC : Supreme Court
2 years, 3 months ago
Order XII Rule 6 CPC - Power To Pass Judgment On Admissions Discretionary Cannot Be Claimed As A Matter Of Right: Supreme Court
2 years, 8 months ago
Purchaser Of Suit Property Cannot File Application Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objecting Execution Of Decree By Decree Holder: Supreme Court
2 years, 8 months ago
Exemption From Attachment - To Get Benefit Of Section 64(2) CPC, Subsequent Purchaser Must Plead & Prove That He Is A Bona Fide Purchaser : Supreme Court
2 years, 11 months ago
Order 38 Rule 5 CPC | Suit Property Can't Be Attached Mechanically Or Merely For Asking Of Plaintiff: Delhi High Court
2 years, 11 months ago
CPC Order VIII Rule 1| Belated Filing Of Documents By Defendant Not Permissible Without Leave Of Court: Delhi High Court
3 years, 1 month ago
Filing Affidavits Of Personal Assets Not Permitted Under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC: Delhi High Court
3 years, 1 month ago
Order XXI Rule 16 CPC - Transferee Of Rights In Subject Matter Of Suit Can Apply For Execution Without Separate Assignment Of Decree : Supreme Court
3 years, 5 months ago
[CPC] Court May Grant Leave Under Order XI Rule 5 To File New Documents Not Filed With Plaint: Delhi High Court
3 years, 7 months ago
Section 144 CPC [Restitution] Not Attracted When There Is No Variation Or Reversal Of A Decree Or Order, Reiterates SC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 4 months ago
Non-Mentioning Of Correct Provision Not Fatal To Application If The Power To Pass Order Is Available With Court: SC [Read Judgment]
5 years, 5 months ago

Discover Related