
Supreme Court Invalidates Extensions Of ED Director SK Mishra's Term; Permits Him To Continue Till July 31
Live LawThe Supreme Court on Tuesday held as illegal the extension given to the term of Enforcement Directorate chief SK Mishra for violating the mandate of the Supreme Court's 2021 judgment in the Common Cause case that he should not be given further extension. The Court also upheld the amendments made to the Central Vigilance Commission Act and the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act which allow the Centre to extend the term of the heads of ED and CBI up to 5 years. A three-judge bench of Justices BR Gavai, Vikram Nath, and Sanjay Karol heard the batch of petitions challenging Mishra’s appointment as well the recent amendment to the Central Vigilance Commission Act. In November 2021, three days before Mishra was about to retire, two ordinances were promulgated by the President of India, amending the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 and the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. In a significant development, in February, amicus curiae KV Viswanathan told the a bench comprising Justices Gavai and Aravind Kumar that not only the third extension granted to the chief of Enforcement Directorate, but also the amendment to the Central Vigilance Commission Act permitting the central government to extend the tenure by one year at a time, up to a total of five years, was illegal.
History of this topic

Supreme Court extends ED chief’s tenure after earlier order declaring it illegal
The Hindu
Supreme Court allows ED chief Sanjay Kumar Mishra to continue till Sep 15 in ‘larger public interest’
Hindustan Times
‘Some serve political interests’: Kapil Sibal after Amit Shah’s ED chief remark
Live Mint
'ED will continue to work against the corrupt', Home Minister Amit Shah reminds politicians rejoicing SC verdict against extension of ED chief's tenure
Op India
3rd Extension for ED Chief Illegal: Supreme Court
Deccan Chronicle
ED chief Mishra must go by end of month; extensions illegal: SC
Live Mint
Nullification Of Court Direction By Legislation Impermissible Without Altering Basis Of Judgment : Supreme Court In ED Director's Case
Live Law
SC verdict on extension of tenure of ED Director a ’slap’ on govt’s face: Cong
Live Mint
SC Calls ED Chief Sanjay Mishra's Extension Illegal, But What Else did it Say?
The Quint
Sanjay Kumar Mishra will not continue as ED Director beyond November 2023: Centre informs Supreme Court
The Hindu
SC asks govt. whether Mishra is so indispensable to ED
The Hindu
Further extension to ED Director Mishra illegal and must go, SC told
Deccan Chronicle
Challenge To ED Chief's Tenure Extension | Not Concerned With Politics Of Petitioners, Says Supreme Court
Live Law
ED Chief Tenure Hearing Today: Why Amicus Curiae Has Called Extension Illegal
The Quint
ED Director's Term Extension & 2021 CVC Amendment Act Illegal: Amicus KV Viswanathan To Supreme Court
Live Law
SC tells govt. that challenge before it to ED Director’s ‘piecemeal’ tenure extensions is not about ‘politics’
The Hindu
Pleas challenging tenure extension of ED Director filed for personal motive: Centre in Supreme Court
The Hindu
Extension of ED Chief’s Tenure | ‘Subsequent Legislative Change Not Ground To Recall Earlier Order’, Supreme Court Tells Centre
Live Law
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Centre On Plea Challenging Third Extension Given To ED Director SK Mishra
Live Law
ED director Sanjay Kumar Mishra gets one-year extension
The Hindu
Supreme Court issues notice to govt on ED Director's tenure extension
The Hindu
SC to Hear on Friday Plea Against Tenure Extension of ED Director Up to 5 Years
News 18
Supreme Court declines to intervene in plea against extension of ED Director’s tenure
The Hindu
Supreme Court To Hear Plea Challenging Extension Of ED Director's Term On April 16
Live Law
Common Cause Moves Supreme Court Against Retrospective Extension Of ED Director Sanjay Kumar Mishra's 's Tenure Beyond 2 Yrs
Live LawDiscover Related
















![Delhi High Court Monthly Digest: February 2025 [Citations 119- 251]](/static/images/error.jpg)


















![[SC/ST Act] Victim Belonging SC/ST Community Not Sufficient To Attract Offence Without Intention To Humiliate Due To Caste Identity: P&H High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)












