Shared ownership of protected monuments with Waqf Board causes conflict, ASI tells Parliamentary panel on Waqf Bill
The HinduQuoting the examples of Fatehpur Sikri in Agra and Atala Masjid in Jaunpur, the Archaeological Survey of India told a Parliamentary panel that having protected monuments which are also notified as Waqf property give rise to conflicts and administrative issues. Contesting this claim, Opposition members of the committee argued that no monument is arbitrarily appropriated by the Waqf Board without historical evidence supporting their ownership, noting that the ASI’s own governing legislation — the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act — equips the organisation to deal with such cases. The ASI shared a list of 53 protected monuments which have also been declared as Waqf property by the Waqf Board, using the Waqf Act, 1995. ASI officials also accused the Board of carrying out “several additions and alterations” to the original structure of these protected monuments, hampering the “authenticity and integrity” of such structures.