No, surrogacy is not exploitative
“Motherhood is a state of being which has, from time immemorial, been defined by a set of cliched, internalized words that are as powerful as they are evocative. In our minds, the creation, sustenance and nurturing of life hinges on the blending of these words into synonymity.” I wrote these words in in the preface to my 2014 book Baby Makers: The Story Of Indian Surrogacy, and went on to ask whether being a “mother” necessarily includes the whole gamut of actions like conceiving, carrying and bearing a child. A woman who chooses to carry someone else’s baby in her womb, she is labelled exploited. Since the woman’s womb is an integral part of her body, she cannot be coerced into carrying someone else’s child. When author Taslima Nasreen described children born through surrogacy as “readymade babies”—the same day Chopra and Jones announced their child’s birth—she exposed the monumental ignorance most people have about surrogacy.

Discover Related

What are new changes to India's surrogacy law? Whom will it benefit?

Explained: Surrogacy & Assisted Reproduction in India - laws, offence & problems

The Crucial Questions That the Surrogacy Bill Leaves Unanswered

The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016: A Critical Appraisal

The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016: A Critical Appraisal

Indian surrogate mothers grab last chance to make babies ahead of ban

‘Indian women are not baby factories’: Anupriya Patel defends Surrogacy bill

Indian surrogates feel hurt by gov’t ban on foreign clients

Foreigners can no longer hire wombs in India: Centre tells SC

Foreigners can no longer hire wombs in India: Centre tells SC
