![An Employee In The Last Year Of Service Should Not Be Transferred Ordinarily : Rajasthan HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
An Employee In The Last Year Of Service Should Not Be Transferred Ordinarily : Rajasthan HC [Read Judgment]
Live LawThe Rajasthan High Court has held that an employee who is set to retire within a year should not be ordinarily transferred. "a superannuating employee, in the last year of his service, should not ordinarily be disturbed by the State, as a model employer, lest the exercise entail unwarranted inconvenience and difficulties for him in post retiral settlement", oberved Justice Alok Sharma,. "a superannuating employee, in the last year of his service, should not ordinarily be disturbed by the State, as a model employer, lest the exercise entail unwarranted inconvenience and difficulties for him in post retiral settlement", oberved Justice Alok Sharma, while dismissing a challenge brought against the order of administrative tribunal, which had quashed a transfer order. Also, the decision of the Rajasthan High Court in Manjula Patak v State of Rajasthan, holding that an employee who is to retire within one year should not be ordinarily transferred, was referred.
History of this topic

Rajasthan High Court Orders State To Release Retiral Benefits Of Employee Who Was Granted Premature Voluntary Retirement
Live Law
State To Consider 'Exceptional Personal Hardships' Faced By Employees: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Transfer Of Nurse Who Looks After Aged Mother
Live Law
Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Employee's Demotion From Post Held For 17 Years, Says Decision Rejecting Peer's Plea Seeking Same Relief Not In Rem
Live Law
Patna High Court Upholds Reinstatement Of Employee, Rules Compulsory Retirement Must Be Based On Subjective Satisfaction
Live Law
Preposterous To Assume Judges Can't Commit Mistake While Passing Orders: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Compulsory Retirement Of ADJ After 9 Yrs
Live Law
"Cruelty Case By Daughter-In-Law Not Related To Official Duty": Rajasthan HC Grants Retiral Benefits To Deceased Govt Employee's Heirs After 21 Yrs
Live Law
Order Of Compulsory Retirement Not Punishment, Does Not Require Observation Of Principles Of Natural Justice: Rajasthan High Court
Live Law
Bank's Decision Reducing Retirement Age Illogical; Affected Employees Entitled To Salary For Out Of Service Period: Rajasthan High Court
Live Law
Supreme Court Directs Compulsory Retirement Of Judicial Officer; Says Solitary Remark About Lack Of Integrity Sufficient
Live Law
Rajasthan political crisis | Supreme Court refuses Rajasthan Speaker’s plea against High Court order
The Hindu
Five Important Principles relating to Compulsory Retirement
Live LawDiscover Related


























![Supreme Court Weekly Digest March 2025 [March 10 - 16, 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)




















