Column: Prop. 29 would stiffen requirements for California dialysis clinics. It’s also political extortion
LA TimesPolitical extortion was not what reformers intended when they created California’s system of direct democracy 111 years ago. Proposition 29’s patient safeguards are needed, he says, because “these are some of the worst providers in the health industry. And these are some of the frailest patients… “There’s a lot of profit gouging.” But if the situation is that bad, why isn’t the union making a serious effort to pass Proposition 29? The dialysis providers feel they can’t take a chance on Proposition 29 passing because, according to the nonpartisan legislative analyst, it “would increase each clinic’s costs by several hundred thousand dollars annually on average.” That might force some clinics to close, the analyst says. Nobody’s disputing that,” says Dr. Bryan Wong, an Oakland kidney specialist who opposes Proposition 29.