It Is For State To Assess, Review Threat Perception: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea For Withdrawal Of 'Z+' Security To Mukesh Ambani & Family
4 years, 4 months ago

It Is For State To Assess, Review Threat Perception: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea For Withdrawal Of 'Z+' Security To Mukesh Ambani & Family

Live Law  

Dismissing a plea seeking withdrawal of security cover to Reliance Industries' Mukesh Ambani and his family members, the Supreme Court on Tuesday, nevertheless, observed that "it is for the State to assess and review the threat perception of individual on case to case basis". The bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and M. R. Shah were hearing a SLP against the December, 2019 decision of the Bombay High Court, where it was held that that the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai and other respondents "have no option but to ensure that the highest level Z+ security is provided to these private respondents", "irrespective of whether any individual or any authority is convinced about the existence or otherwise of real threat to their life or liberty", particularly when they are "willing to bear the entire cost for said security to protect their lives in view of their own grave threat perceptions". Noting that the Supreme Court in the 2015 Biswanath's case had held that if the police is satisfied about the existence of threat to the life and security of citizens, they shall be provided free security, the division bench of the High Court, in the impugned judgment, had went to the extent of stating that "Irrespective of the satisfaction of the police, the citizen can claim protection based on his own threat perception by paying cost for the same. "Once threat from terrorist organisation has been found by the the Respondent State and already as noted above in the said earlier judgment of the co-ordinate bench considering existence of such treat perception and likely cascading effect thereof, private respondent's family members to have security protection of the highest category to protect their life and limb cannot be alleged as lacking in substance", it said.

History of this topic

SC directs to provide Z-plus security to Mukesh Ambani, family members
2 years ago
Unidentified caller threatens to blow up Amitabh Bachchan, Dharmendra, Ambani's bungalows
2 years ago
Highest Security Be Provided To Mukesh Ambani & Family Throughout India & Abroad : Supreme Court
2 years ago
SC directs MHA to ensure Z+ security cover to Mukesh Ambani and his family with THIS condition I DETAILS
2 years ago
Why Should State Exchequer Bear Z+ Security Expenses: P&H HC Allows Navjot Singh Sidhu To Appear Through Video Conferencing
2 years, 4 months ago
Supreme Court Allows Centre To Continue Security Cover For Mukesh Ambani Family; Quashes Tripura HC Proceedings
2 years, 7 months ago
Centre Moves Supreme Court Against Tripura HC Entertaining PIL Questioning Security Cover To Mukesh Ambani Family
2 years, 8 months ago
SC rejects PIL seeking to withdraw Mukesh Ambani, family’s Z+ security
4 years, 4 months ago
Supreme Court Weekly Round-Up
8 years, 6 months ago
Bombay High Court dismisses PIL challenging 'Z' security to Mukesh Ambani
11 years, 7 months ago
Why Z class security to 'private businessman' Mukesh Ambani, SC asks govt
11 years, 10 months ago

Discover Related