
Sale Of Corporate Debtor As Going Concern Under Liquidation Regulations Takes Precedence Over Scheme Of Compromise U/S 230: NCLAT
Live LawThe NCLAT Chennai bench of Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma and Jatindranath Swain affirmed that the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern under Regulations 32 & 32A of the Liquidation Regulations is more transparent and effective; therefore, the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern will have precedence, rather than resorting to the Scheme of Compromise under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013. That the Liquidator has proceeded with the consideration of the Scheme of Arrangement and the sale of the assets of the Corporate Debtor simultaneously, which is against the provisions of the Code and particularly that, as contained under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013. NCLAT's Analysis The tribunal, at the outset, dealt with scheme pertaining to sale of a corporate debtor as going concern and referred to section 230 of the Companies Act which provides for scheme for compromise or arrangement and observed that Section 230 was created in 2013, prior to enactment of I & B Code, 2016, and the concept of CIRP and Liquidation were yet to be born. On the other hand, the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern under Regulations 32 & 32A is more transparent and effective; therefore, the sale of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern will have precedence, rather than resorting to the Scheme of Compromise under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.
History of this topic

Scrapping a key bankruptcy rule may yield faster liquidation, better recovery
Live Mint
Penalties U/S 65 Of IBC Can Be Imposed Against Those Who Fraudulently Initiate Insolvency Process: NCLAT
Live Law
When Debt Is Not Unequivocally Admitted By Corporate Debtor, Application U/S 9 Of IBC Must Not Be Entertained: NCLAT
Live Law![IBC Weekly Round-Up [17th February-23rd February 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)
IBC Weekly Round-Up [17th February-23rd February 2025]
Live Law
Corporate Debtor Immune From Prosecution Under PMLA Post Approval Of Resolution Plan: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Pre-Existing Dispute Between Financial Creditor And Corporate Debtor Doesn't Bar Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT
Live Law
Pre-Existing Dispute Between Financial Creditor And Corporate Debtor Doesn't Bar Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT
Live Law
Economic Survey 2025: IBC nudging companies to resolve their distress early
Live Mint
Decision To Liquidate Corporate Debtor Cannot Be Faulted When Revival Is Not A Viable Option: NCLAT
Live Law
Withdrawal Of Liquidation Application Can Be Permitted When CoC Allows RP To File Application Seeking Extension Of CIRP Time Period: NCLAT
Live Law
Liquidation Proceeds Must Be Distributed Amongst Secured Creditors Based On Admitted Claims U/S 53 Of IBC: NCLAT
Live Law
Insolvency Application Against Personal Guarantor Is Maintainable U/S 60(1) Of IBC Even If No CIRP Process Is Pending Against CD: NCLAT
Live Law
Commercial Wisdom Of CoC In Opting For Liquidation And Rejecting Resolution Plan Of Ineligible Applicant Is “Non-Justiciable”: NCLAT
Live Law
NCLAT Upholds Status Of Canara Bank As Financial Creditor For Providing Loans To Homebuyers Of CD, Distinguishes Value Infracon Judgment
Live Law
Application U/S 95(1) Of IBC Against Personal Guarantor Not Maintainable In Absence Of CIRP Proceedings Against Corporate Debtor: NCLT Kolkata
Live Law
Annual Digest Of IBC Cases: 2024
Live Law
Pendency Of Proceedings Before NCLT For Approval Of Scheme Of Arrangement Does Not Preclude Financial Creditor From Filing Petition U/S 7: NCLAT
Live Law
Secured Creditor Is Liable To Pay Liquidator's Fees Under Rule 21A Of Liquidation Regulations If Option U/S 52 Of IBC Is Exercised: NCLAT
Live Law![IBC Weekly Round Up [2nd December To 8th December, 2024]](/static/images/error.jpg)
IBC Weekly Round Up [2nd December To 8th December, 2024]
Live Law
Section 43 Of IBC Cannot Be Attracted When No Transaction Was Made By Corporate Debtor: NCLAT
Live Law
Approval Of Resolution Plan By CoC Cannot Be Interfered With Unless Section 30(2) Of Code Is Breached: NCLAT
Live Law
Limitation Period For Both Corporate Debtor And Personal Guarantor Will Commence From Same Date: NCLT Hyderabad
Live Law
Pre-CIRP Dues Cannot Be Recovered After Admission Of Corporate Debtor Into Insolvency: NCLAT
Live Law
Once Plausibility Of Pre-Existing Dispute Is Established, Application U/S 9 Of IBC Must Be Rejected: NCLAT
Live Law
Only Assets Are Transferred In Going Concern Sale Of Corporate Debtor Under Liquidation, Liabilities Must Be Settled U/S 53 Of IBC: NCLT Mumbai
Live Law
Mere Possession Over Assets Of Corporate Debtor Under SARFAESI Act Does Not Bar Filing Of Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT Kolkata
Live Law
Mere Possession Over Assets Of Corporate Debtor Under SARFAESI Act Does Not Bar Filing Of Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT Kolkata
Live Law![IBC Weekly Round-Up [18th November To 24th November 2024]](/static/images/error.jpg)
IBC Weekly Round-Up [18th November To 24th November 2024]
Live Law
NCLT Is Not Right Forum To Decide Whether Closure Of Factory Under Industrial Dispute Act Was As Per Law: NCLAT
Live Law
Property In Possession Of Corporate Debtor Sold When Petition U/S 7 Of IBC Was In Consideration Cannot Be Excluded From Assets: NCLAT
Live Law
Any Amount Proposed In Settlement Plan U/S 12A Of IBC Cannot Be Refunded If Plan Is Approved: NCLAT
Live Law
Liquidator's Reliance On Transaction Audit Report Sufficient To File Application For Avoidance Of Preferential Transactions U/S 43 Of IBC: NCLAT
Live Law
Once Pre-Existing Dispute With Regard To Operational Debt Is Established, Petition U/S 9 Of IBC Cannot Be Admitted: NCLAT
Live Law
IBC Shall Prevail Over TRAI Act, Any Penalty Imposed By TRAI To Be Recovered As Per Scheme Of IBC: NCLAT
Live Law
Liquidation Is Last Resort, Broader Public Interest In Resolving Corporate Insolvency Should Be Taken Into Account: NCLT Kolkata
Live Law
Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 22nd July 2024 To 28th July 2024
Live Law
Directing Corporate Debtor To Civil Courts Or Arbitration For Admitted Dues Undermines IBC Objectives: NCLT Mumbai
Live Law
Half Yearly Digest Of IBC Cases : January To June,2024
Live Law
NCLT Kochi: Creditors Can't Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantor Without Establishing Independent Default By CD
Live Law
NCLT Asks IBBI To Incorporate Provisions In CIRP Regulations For Treating Transferred Winding-Up Cases
Live Law
IBBI proposes amendments to insolvency rules; seeks public comments
The Hindu
NCLAT Delhi: Section 95(1) Of IBC Permits Creditors To Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantors Via A Resolution Professional
Live Law
CoC Is Empowered To Liquidate Corporate Debtor Any Time After It's Constitution Or Before Resolution Plan Is Confirmed: NCLT Delhi
Live Law
Preferential Transaction Under Section 43 Of IBC, Fraudulent Intent Need Not To Be Proved : NCLT Mumbai
Live Law
CIRP Can Be Initiated Against The Corporate Debtor Despite Principal-Agent Relationship Between CD And Ultimate Client: NCLT Mumbai
Live Law
IBC Revolutionizes Corporate Insolvency
Deccan Chronicle
NCLT Kolkata: Any Attachment Of Tainted Assets Of Corporate Debtor Before CIRP Commencement Would Always Be Available To Fulfill The Object Of IBC
Live Law
NCLT Kolkata: Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA Won't Bar Admission Of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC
Live Law
NCLT Kolkata: IBC Prevails Over State Financial Corporation Act, 1951
Live LawDiscover Related
![IBC Cases Weekly Round Up [17th March-23rd March 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)











![IBC Weekly Round-Up [3rd March To 9th March, 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)



![IBC Monthly Digest [February 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)























![IBC Weekly Round-Up [10th February -16th February 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)

