How best to regulate Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence has exploded in capability in recent years, offering unprecedented advances in fields such as computer vision, language processing, robotics and more. In contrast, the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, takes a more prescriptive approach of classifying AI systems based on risk perceptions and imposing graded regulatory requirements accordingly. We propose a third approach based on CAS thinking with five principles: First, guardrails and partitions should establish clear boundary conditions to constrain undesirable AI behaviours. Hard “guardrails” should ensure that AI systems don’t steer into obviously risky territories such as nuclear weapons. To prevent systemic failures, it’s essential to erect “partition walls” between distinct AI systems.
Discover Related

The five pillars of AI governance in India

The EU AI Act: Implications and lessons for India

EU parliament greenlights landmark artificial intelligence regulations

EU politicians back new rules on AI ahead of landmark vote

An overview of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act

Europe reaches a deal on the world’s first comprehensive AI rules

Can Artificial Intelligence be regulated?

India can blend the EU and US models of AI regulation

How Europe is leading the world in the push to regulate AI

How Europe is leading the world in building guardrails around AI
