It’s an insult to authors not to finish each and every book you start
The best of Voices delivered to your inbox every week - from controversial columns to expert analysis Sign up for our free weekly Voices newsletter for expert opinion and columns Sign up to our free weekly Voices newsletter SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy policy Earlier this week, the novelist Mark Billingham caused a minor stir when he suggested that readers should throw a book “across the room angrily” if it hasn’t gripped them in the first 20 pages. Hilary Rose, writing in The Times, explained that she “bitterly regret not heeding Billingham’s life lesson sooner”. If the first three bites of your meal taste terrible, you don’t need to keep on eating, expecting it will get better.” Well, no, though I’d point out that if the starter was disappointing, you might still stick around for the main. The idea that we read simply to be entertained – as an easy form of escapism – seems to underpin all the arguments for giving up on a book: “I couldn’t get into it”, “it didn’t grip me”, “too slow”.
Discover Related

HT reviewer Arunima Mazumdar picks her favourite read of 2024

L.A. legend Chris Kraus is finding answers in her sleep, and she’s not looking back

Read more, read better, but how to finish a book if you're a distracted reader?

Jack Reacher book With Child looks at the series’ popularity: Andy Martin interview.

Rowling, Tolkien, Austen novels vie for bragging rights

Dave Eggers interview: 'Young readers are the purest. They're so honest'

7 short interesting books which you can read in a single day

Reasons why reading book is much better than watching its movie adaptation
