Bombay High Court Weekly Round Up : 24 July To 30 July, 2022
Live LawNominal Index The Pr. Approach Of Believing That No Action Can Be Taken Against Wrongdoings Of Govt Servants Needs To Stop: Bombay High Court Case Title – Jaising Nivrutti Sonawane v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Citation : 2022 LiveLaw 266 The Bombay High Court has dismissed a government bus conductor's appeal against dismissal of service stating, "The approach in this country of believing that when one works for government no action can ever be taken no matter how persistently one is found to be doing wrong is an approach that needs to now stop as fast as possible." Section 29A Of The A&C Act Applies Prospectively Does Not Apply To Arbitration That Commenced Before The 2015 Amendment: Bombay High Court Case Title: Meenanath Fatarpekar v. MicroStrategy India Pvt. Consent Obtained For Sex In Second Marriage Without Disclosing First Marriage Prima Facie Constitutes Rape: Bombay High Court Case Title: Siddharth Banthia v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. Bombay High Court Directs National Board To Decide Couple's Plea To Import Cryo-Preserved Embryos From US Lab Case Title – XYZ v Union of India and ors Citation - 2022 LiveLaw 274 The Bombay High Court asked the National Board – constituted under the 2021 new Assisted Reproductive Technology Act and Surrogacy Act to decide a couple's plea to import their cryo-preserved embryo to India, stored in a laboratory in the United States since 2016.