Interpretation Of Provisions Of Major Port Trusts Act: SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court has referred the following issues in relation to interpretation of the Major Port Trusts Act, to a larger bench: Whether in the interpretation of the provision of Section 2 of the MPT Act, the question of title of goods, and the point of time at which title passes to the consignee is relevant to determine the liability of the consignee or steamer agent in respect of. The Supreme Court has referred the following issues in relation to interpretation of the Major Port Trusts Act, to a larger bench: Whether in the interpretation of the provision of Section 2 of the MPT Act, the question of title of goods, and the point of time at which title passes to the consignee is relevant to determine the liability of the consignee or steamer agent in respect of charges to be paid to the Port Trust; Whether a consignor or a steamer agent is absolved of the responsibility to pay charges due to a Port Trust, for its services in respect of goods which are not cleared by the consignee, once the Bill of lading is endorsed or the delivery order is issued; Whether a steamer agent can be made liable for payment of storage charges/demurrage, etc. in respect of goods which are not cleared by the consignee, where the steamer agent has not issued a delivery order; if so, to what extent; What are the principles which determine whether a Port Trust is entitled to recover its dues, from the steamer agent or the consignee; and While the Port Trust does have certain statutory obligations with regard to the goods entrusted to it, whether there is any obligation, either statutory or contractual, that obliges the Port Trust to de-stuff every container that is entrusted to it and return the empty containers to the shipping agent. The issue before the high court was whether the liability to pay ‘ground rent’ on containers unloaded at Cochin Port, but not cleared by the consignees/importers and refused to be de-stuffed by the port, on the ground of inadequate storage space, can be imposed on the owners of the 3 vessel/steamer agents beyond the period of 75 days, fixed by the Tariff Authority of Major Ports, a statutory body constituted under Section 47A of the Major Port Trust Act, 1963.
Discover Related
![Madras High Court Monthly Digest - March 2025 [Citations 81-122]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Madras High Court Monthly Digest - March 2025 [Citations 81-122]
![Kerala High Court Monthly Digest: March 2025 [Citations: 144 - 221]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Kerala High Court Monthly Digest: March 2025 [Citations: 144 - 221]

Govt. to challenge Munambam order before Division Bench of Kerala HC

Cash-for-job scam: SC stays Madras HC order for CBI probe against ex-AIADMK minister

Madras High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 10 to March 16, 2025

Kerala High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 10- March 16, 2025
![Madras High Court Monthly Digest - February 2025 [Citations 39-80]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Madras High Court Monthly Digest - February 2025 [Citations 39-80]

Recording court proceedings amounts to interfering with administration of justice: Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 3 - March 9, 2025

Madras High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 3 to March 9, 2025

Madras High Court imposes Rs 5L cost on TN for ‘re-agitating’ settled case

High Court notice to Karnataka government over dropping cases against MPs, MLAs

Negotiable Instruments Act: All India Annual Digest 2024

Madras High Court issues directions for speedy disposal of cheque bounce cases
