Article 22(5): Delay In Considering Representation Against Detention Order A Ground To Nullify It, Says Karnataka HC
Live LawThe Karnataka High Court has said that delayed consideration by authorities of the representation made by a detenu amounts to violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India and constitutes a ground to nullify the order of detention. Jayamma vs. Commissioner of Police, Bengaluru and Leelavathi vs. Commissioner of Police, Bengaluru & others, the bench said: "A duty is cast on the State to consider the representation of the detenue and it has to be exercised at the earliest point of time. What is the 'earliest point of time' is necessarily subjective and the settled principle being that the representation has to be considered at the earliest point of time and if there is a delay in considering the representation, then the entire detention order would have to be set aside on that ground alone." "Thus non-consideration of the representation had adversely affected the right of petitioner No.1 due to the failure on the part of the State Government to consider the representation as nearly six months from the date of representation," said the bench The court also said that the petitioner was not given adequate time to submit his representation.