Pending Litigations Between Parties Can't Be Sole Ground To Quash Criminal Proceedings U/S 482 CrPC: Jharkhand High Court
Live LawThe Jharkhand High Court has held that merely because there is a case and a counter case between the parties or merely because there has been a title suit amongst the parties, the same is not sufficient to quash the criminal proceedings instituted by one of them against the other. The lower court conducted an inquiry in the said protest-cum-complaint case and vide impugned order dated 06.04.2019, took cognizance of offence under Section 417, 465, 471, 482, and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, and directed issuance of summons against the petitioners. The prayer before the present court sought to quash the criminal proceedings arising from the said cognizance by the lower court. It noted that the case at hand does not satisfy any of the following conditions laid down in the case of Bhajan Singh for quashing the criminal proceeding: -Where allegations made in FIR or complaint, even if taken at their face value, do not prima facie constitute any offence or warrant an investigation under Section 156 CrPC; -Where uncontroverted allegations made in FIR and the evidence collected in support of the same do not disclose commission of any offence; -Where allegations made in the FIR are so absurd and inherently improbable that no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused; -Where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or the concerned Act to the institution and continuance of the proceedings; -Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide.