Does globalization have to mean massive inequality? Maybe not — there's a better way
If globalization remains a nebulous concept, its negative repercussions may today seem more plain than ever. For instance, when comparing changes in equality in the U.S. and Europe since 1980, the United States’ comparatively much larger increase in inequality can be traced to America’s decisions in key policy areas concerning inequality – the undermining of the income tax, the cost of higher education, a grievously outdated minimum wage and the denial of universal health care. To a great extent, this short-termism can be attributed to the imperatives of short electoral cycles – especially in the West, policy-makers don’t serve long enough terms to tackle complex social and economic issues. In the face of growing isolationism, the world’s leaders must recommit to multilateral governance ensuring fair trade, safeguarding human rights and promoting just social policies. To do so, we must introduce progressive social welfare policies, in particular, universal health care and legislation raising the minimum wage to reflect costs of living.
Discover Related

Spiralling inequality won’t fix itself. We need a movement

Kaushik Basu: Future generations would be aghast at today’s inequality

Globalization not reversed

The world must fight inequality to safeguard ideals of democracy

Globalization in our times: Are we at an ebb, a pause or the end?

As millions fell into poverty during the pandemic, billionaires’ wealth soared

‘Nations must develop action plans to tackle inequality’

Why The Internet Loves And Hates Oxfam's Global Inequality Report

How "globalization" became a modern-day insult, and why it's important

Emerging markets encouraged to defend globalization

Emerging markets encouraged to defend globalization

博鳌论坛全球化宣言全文(双语)

博鳌论坛全球化宣言全文(双语)
