![Plea Under Art. 226 To Regularise Illegal Appointment Can’t Succeed: Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Plea Under Art. 226 To Regularise Illegal Appointment Can’t Succeed: Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]
Live LawThe Allahabad High Court, in the case of Ram Krishna In 8802013 Vs. State of UP Through Secretary Vocational & Technical Education Lucknow & Ors, has noted that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to regularise an illegal appointment will not stand the test of law.Appointments to public posts have to be made in accordance with the rules formulated by the. The Allahabad High Court, in the case of Ram Krishna In 8802013 Vs. State of UP Through Secretary Vocational & Technical Education Lucknow & Ors, has noted that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to regularise an illegal appointment will not stand the test of law. There should be transparency in the public appointment and what has been deprecated by the Court since long time and time again is "backdoor appointments or appointments dehors the rules.” The court also observed that the practice of employing daily and casual labourers is widespread and subsequently attempts are made to regularise their services. Therefore, the exercise to fill up the vacancies at the earliest must start in advance to ensure that the selected person may join immediately after availability of the post, and hence, there may be no occasion to appoint any person on ad hoc basis for the reason that the problem of inducting the daily labourers who are ensured of a regular appointment subsequently has to be avoided and a fair procedure must be adopted giving equal opportunity to everyone.” The court also observed that the employees do not have a vested right for regularisation of services and the state cannot regularise an illegal appointment.
History of this topic

Compassionate Appointment Cannot Be Given By Management Of Institute Where Deceased Was Employed, Must Be Placed Before DIOS: Allahabad HC
Live Law
Mere Appointment In Central Govt Services Doesn't Entitle Employment In State Services: Allahabad High Court
Live Law
Can't Perpetuate "Pernicious Practice" Of Indefinite Irregular Appointment: Jharkhand HC Orders Regularization Of Clerk After 10 Yrs
Live Law
Statute/Rules Allowing Employer To Deny Appointment Only Due To Non-Disclosure Of Criminal Cases Would Be Unjust: Allahabad HC
Live Law
Teacher's Service After Regularization Can't Be Terminated Merely Due To Lack Of Qualification At Time Of Initial Appointment: Allahabad HC
Live Law
Regularisation Of Backdoor Appointments Infringe Fundamental Rights Of Candidates Appearing In Competitive Process: Madras High Court
Live Law
Appointment In Public Services Secured Through Fraudulent Concealment Void Ab Initio, Long Continuation In Service Immaterial: Allahabad High Court
Live Law![Candidates cannot be made to suffer because of the mistake of Public Service Commission: Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Candidates cannot be made to suffer because of the mistake of Public Service Commission: Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Candidates cannot be made to suffer because of the mistake of Public Service Commission: Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Candidates cannot be made to suffer because of the mistake of Public Service Commission: Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related



















![[U.P Govt Servant Seniority Rules] No Provision For Finding Authority To Redetermine Seniority After Final List Has Been Prepared: Allahabad High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
![[U.P Govt Servant Seniority Rules] No Provision For Finding Authority To Redetermine Seniority After Final List Has Been Prepared: Allahabad High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)


![[Compassionate Appointment] Law Prevailing On Date Of Employee's Death Applicable Irrespective Of When Application For Appointment Was Submitted: Rajasthan HC](/static/images/error.jpg)
























