SC Repels Broadcasters' Challenge Against TRAI Tariff Order & Interconnection Regulations [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court today repelled the challenge made against the validity of tariff order and interconnection regulations introduced by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India in 2017.The bench of Justice R F Nariman and Justice Navin Sinha dismissed the appeals filed against Madras High Court's judgment which had refused to entertain the challenge by 2:1 majority.The HC bench of the. The Supreme Court today repelled the challenge made against the validity of tariff order and interconnection regulations introduced by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India in 2017. To maintain the balance between the subscribers’ interests and broadcasters’ interests, again the Authority makes it clear that broadcasters have complete freedom to price channels which do not form part of any bouquet and are offered only on an a-lacarte basis" The Court also extracted in the judgment the Memorandum of TRAI explaining the reasons behind the Regulations as "Abnormal high price of a pay channel may result in higher price of a bouquet leading to adverse impact on subscribers' interests. It was further observed : "If in exercise of its regulatory power under the TRAI Act, TRAI were to impinge upon compensation payable for copyright, the best way in which both statutes can be harmonized is to state that, the TRAI Act, being a statute conceived in public interest, which is to serve the interest of both broadcasters and consumers, must prevail, to the extent of any inconsistency, over the Copyright Act which is an Act which protects the property rights of broadcasters" The Court expressed the view that TRAI wil prevail over Copy Right Act to the extent royalties/compensation payable to the broadcasters under the Copyright Act are regulated in public interest by TRAI under the TRAI Act.



Trai finds six cable firms violating new tariff order, seeks compliance in 5 days





Discover Related

X Challenges Govt’s Content Blocking in Karnataka High Court

X sues government for using IT Act to block content, says arbitrary censorship

No copyright in news that is freely available, OpenAI tells Delhi HC

Can’t regulate VPN apps, only MeitY can: TRAI

Will back media in navigating its digital transition: Vaishnaw

HC experts differ in OpenAI copyright case

TRAI recommends new approach to set radio ads, programme code

OpenAI says California apt jurisdiction for copyright suits by Indian news agency

TRAI releases recommendations on “regulatory framework for ground-based broadcasters”

Govt blocks 18 OTT platforms for publishing obscene, vulgar content

Creators fret over revenue loss due to copyright infringement

73 complaints against vulgar ads on TV channels: Govt tells Parliament

73 complaints against vulgar ads on TV channels: Centre tells Parliament

Canadian news publishers sue OpenAI over alleged copyright infringement

OpenAI vs ANI: Why ‘hallucinations’ are unlikely to go away soon

ChatGPT sued for copyright infringement, OpenAI gets Delhi High Court's summons

ANI sues OpenAI for alleged violation of intellectual property rights

How to Stay Out of Legal Trouble While Promoting Brands: A Guide for Influencers

India revises Broadcasting Bill, online creators fear crackdown

Broadcasting Bill: Back to first principles

Centre withdraws draft of Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2024

Govt guided by differentiated approach for OTTs, cable TV content regulation: MIB

Media bodies voice concern over draft broadcasting services bill

Broadcasting Bill 2023 relies too much on delegated legislation: Industry bodies to MIB

A licence raj for digital content creators

New draft of broadcasting bill: News influencers may be classified as broadcasters

Squelch Will Of Parties In Consumer Welfare Issues: Supreme Court Of India
