Patna High Court Upholds Reinstatement Of Employee, Rules Compulsory Retirement Must Be Based On Subjective Satisfaction
Live LawThe Patna High Court recently upheld the reinstatement of a Class-III employee posted in the Governor's Secretariat, Bihar who was made to compulsorily retire from the services in the midst of the departmental proceedings pending against him. Affirming the Single Bench's decision, the Division Bench comprising Chief Justice K Vinod Chandran and Justice Partha Sarthy observed that it would be inappropriate and unjust to order compulsory retirement of the employee on the charges labeled against the employee for which a departmental proceeding was pending against the employee. The appellants argued that the compulsory retirement order was valid, citing public interest due to the petitioner's age and service record, and referred to the Supreme Court's judgment in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation vs. Babu Lal Jangir, which held such orders were non-punitive with limited scope for judicial review. Dismissing the appellant's contention, the judgment authored by Sarthy J. noted that the petitioner was already undergoing departmental proceedings for the same charges cited in the compulsory retirement order, which was issued prematurely before the proceedings were concluded.