Scope Of Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India: Important Judgments [Part-1]
Live LawV/s DISTRICTCOLLECTOR CHITTOOR DIST. Even assuming that there had been any error in the computation of marks in respect of fixed and movable assets, the High Court could, at best, have remitted the case of respondent Prakash Chandra Chaudhary to the concerned authorities for reconsideration…" In exercise of discretionary power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, the High Court might interfere with administrative matters only if the decision is violative of fundamental or basic principles of justice and fair play or suffers from any patent or flagrant error. 534 OF 2002, HIGH COURT OFALLAHABAD, DATE OF DECISION: 22.01.2016, CORAM: CHIEF JUSTICE DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, JUSTICE DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA & JUSTICE RANJAN ROY " Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 can be filed by a power of attorney holder?" If a person under detention files a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 before the High Court and the writ petition is dismissed, whether by a detailed order after considering the case on merits or by a non-speaking order, and the said detention is not challenged by preferring a special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and is allowed to become final, it would still be open to him to file an independent petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking a writ of habeas corpus. V/s Rajendra Shankar Patil, 8 SCC 329 and in this case, Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr., the scope of interference by the High Court in civil matters/ private disputes under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 was considered and it was held that the High Court committed an error in entertaining writ petition in a dispute between landlord and tenant, where the respondent was only a private landlord.