
Assumption Of Jurisdiction Based On Wrong Facts Can't Form Basis For Initiating Reopening: Mumbai ITAT
Live LawThe Mumbai ITAT there is no question of concealment of fact when the assessee had itself declared the income in its return which was assumed by the AO to be an escaped income. Hence, the ITAT clarified that assumption of jurisdiction based on wrong facts, cannot form basis for initiating reopening. The Division Bench of Anikesh Banerjee and Prashant Maharishi observed that “The revenue assumed that the assessee claimed exemption under section 10 or section 10 of the Act in the return of income of the said investment was matured before the stipulated period. The Revenue assumed that the assessee claimed exemption u/s 10 or section 10 in the return upon the investment which was matured before the stipulated period, added the Bench. Counsel for Appellant/ Assessee: J.P.Bairagra & Rupa Nanda Counsel for Respondent/ Revenue: Manoj Kumar Sinha Case Title: Laxman Gore Shreshtha verses DCIT Case Number: ITA 1908 & 1909/Mum/2024 Click here to read/download the Order
History of this topic

'Entire Case Based On Records Already Considered During Scrutiny': Mumbai ITAT Quashes Reopening Of Assessment Against Shah Rukh Khan For AY 2012-13
Live Law
'Entire Case Based On Records Already Considered During Scrutiny': Mumbai ITAT Quashes Reopening Of Assessment Against Shah Rukh Khan For AY 2012-13
Live Law
AO Bound To Ascertain 'Correctness' Of Information Available Against Assessee, 'Decide' Whether It Is Sufficient To Reopen Assessment: Delhi HC
Live Law
ITO Acted On Complete Change Of Opinion On Same Material With Intent To Review Assessment Order Passed By Him: Bombay HC Quashes Reopening
Live Law
ITO Acted On Complete Change Of Opinion On Same Material With Intent To Review Assessment Order Passed By Him: Bombay HC Quashes Reopening
Live Law
ITAT Weekly Round-Up: 14 To 20 July 2024
Live Law
Assessment Re-Opened By Dept. Based On 'Change Of Opinion'; Himachal Pradesh High Court Quashes Reassessment
Live Law
I-T Authority Fails To Consider Reason For Difference In Sale Consideration & Stamp Duty: Mumbai ITAT Deletes Penalty Levied U/s 270A For Under-Reporting Of Income
Live Law
Ahmedabad ITAT Quashes Reopening In Absence Of Tangible Material With AO To Form Reason To Believe Escaped Assessment
Live Law
Explanation 3 To Sec 147 Can't Be Resorted To Make Addition On Any Other Issue Which Is Not Included In Reasons For Reopening: New Delhi ITAT
Live Law
Reassessment Proceedings Initiated On Account Of Change Of Opinion Merits To Be Quashed: Mumbai ITAT
Live Law
Reopening Initiated On Basis Of Wrong Reasons Renders Very Assessment As Invalid: Mumbai ITAT
Live Law
Reopening Of Assessment Inspired From 'Review' & 'Change Of Opinion' By Subsequent AO Is Deprecated: Madras HC
Live Law
Dept.’s Personal Opinion Not Tangible Material For Reopening Assessment: Calcutta High Court Quashes Reassessment
Live Law
Re-Opening Is Not Permissible As It Falls Within The Purview Of A ‘Change Of Opinion’: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Absence Of Material: Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Proceedings
Live Law
Failure To Disclose All Material Facts Is Essential To Issue Reassessment Notice: Bombay High Court
Live Law
Reopening of IT Assessment By Officer Having No Jurisdiction: Madras High Court Invalidates Proceedings
Live Law
Reassessment Proceedings Can't Be Initiated On Same Set Of Facts Available: ITAT
Live Law
Other Income Tax Additions In Reassessment Proceedings Cannot Be Sustained If Addition on Primary Grounds Is Not Made: ITAT
Live LawDiscover Related






































![[S.292B Income Tax Act] Inadvertent Mistakes In Reassessment Can Be Saved But Assessment Order Overlooking Apparent Error Cannot: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)






