Complainant's Burden Shifting Under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: High Court Observation
4 months, 3 weeks ago

Complainant's Burden Shifting Under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: High Court Observation

Live Law  

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has observed that once the complainant proves that a cheque was issued by the accused to discharge a debt, Section 139 mandates that the burden of proof shifts to the accused. The court dismissed an appeal filed by one Choudhary Piara Singh against an acquittal order issued by the Trial Court in a cheque dishonor case under Section 138 of the NI Act.

Jammu Law Legal Evidence Statutory  singh  ni  accused  jk  wani  proves  139  complainant  court  debt  issued  high  s139  cheque  shifts  loan  discharge

History of this topic

No S.138 NI Act Case Against Ex-Director Of Company When Cause Of Action Arose After IBC Moratorium Was Declared: Supreme Court
4 days, 23 hours ago

No S.138 NI Act Case Against Ex-Director Of Company When Cause Of Action Arose After IBC Moratorium Was Declared: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court held that if the cause of action for the offence of cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has arisen after the declaration of moratorium with respect to the company as per the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, then the proceedings under S.138 NI Act cannot be continued against the ex-director of the …

S. 138 NI Act | Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable If Complainant Is Party To Illegal Transaction: Orissa High Court
Trending News
5 days, 13 hours ago

S. 138 NI Act | Cheque Bounce Case Not Maintainable If Complainant Is Party To Illegal Transaction: Orissa High Court

Live Law  

In an important decision, the Orissa High Court has held that a complainant cannot maintain a case for cheque bounce against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 if she herself is a party to illegal transaction, or in other words, if initially credit was given by the complainant for achieving an illegal purpose. Roy, Virender …

NI Act | Single Complaint For Dishonour Of More Than Three Cheques Maintainable If Covered By Consolidated Demand Notice: J&K High Court
1 week, 3 days ago

NI Act | Single Complaint For Dishonour Of More Than Three Cheques Maintainable If Covered By Consolidated Demand Notice: J&K High Court

Live Law  

Clarifying the legal position under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh has held that mere issuance or dishonour of a cheque does not give rise to a cause of action under Section 138 of the Act. While dismissing a petition challenging a complaint under the NI Act Justice Sanjay Dhar observed that …

NI Act | Advisable To Impose Fine Equivalent To Amount Of Cheque With At Least 6% Interest For Uniformity: Punjab & Haryana High Court
1 week, 3 days ago

NI Act | Advisable To Impose Fine Equivalent To Amount Of Cheque With At Least 6% Interest For Uniformity: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Live Law  

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has said that, to maintain uniformity in imposing fines in cheque bounce cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the fine should be equivalent to the amount of the cheque, plus at least 6% interest per annum from the date of the cheque until the date of the judgment of conviction. The Punjab and Haryana …

NI Act Allows Filing Of Cheque Dishonour Complaint At Place Of Payee Bank; Accused Can't Seek Transfer Citing Inconvenience: Supreme Court
Trending News
2 weeks, 2 days ago

NI Act Allows Filing Of Cheque Dishonour Complaint At Place Of Payee Bank; Accused Can't Seek Transfer Citing Inconvenience: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court today ruled that a cheque dishonor complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, should be filed in the court having jurisdiction over the branch of the bank where the payee maintains an account i.e., where the cheque is presented for collection. “A conjoint reading of Section 142 along with the explanation thereof, makes the …

Moratorium Period Under IBC Does Not Bar Payment Of Compensation Under NI Act: J&K High Court Orders ₹4 Crore Interim Compensation
2 weeks, 3 days ago

Moratorium Period Under IBC Does Not Bar Payment Of Compensation Under NI Act: J&K High Court Orders ₹4 Crore Interim Compensation

Live Law  

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that the declaration of a moratorium would not bar the complainant from filing a complaint under the NI Act. The court said that the debtor cannot take refuge under the Code to frustrate proceedings under the NI Act if he is found liable to pay compensation in the proceedings. The trial court directed …

Criminal Liability For Cheque Dishonour Primarily On Drawer Company, Officers Are Held Liable Only If Section 141 Is Satisfied: Gujarat HC
1 month, 1 week ago

Criminal Liability For Cheque Dishonour Primarily On Drawer Company, Officers Are Held Liable Only If Section 141 Is Satisfied: Gujarat HC

Live Law  

Referring to various case laws on this aspect Justice Divyesh A. Joshi in his order said, “It is found out from the materials available on record that the applicant accused no.3 is not the signatory of the cheque and she has tendered her resignation way-back in the year 2013. As per the above-stated case laws, the liability under Section 141 …

Section 138 NI Act | Mumbai Court Convicts Pharma Company In Cheque Dishonour Case, Imposes Fine Of ₹1.83 Crore
1 month, 3 weeks ago

Section 138 NI Act | Mumbai Court Convicts Pharma Company In Cheque Dishonour Case, Imposes Fine Of ₹1.83 Crore

Live Law  

A Magistrate Court in Mumbai has recently convicted Elder Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for the offence of dishonour of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, imposing a cost of Rs. 1 had issued cheque to the complainant for discharge of legal liability and it was presented by complainant to bank and even after statutory demand notice accused failed …

Section 138 NI Act | Mumbai Court Convicts Pharma Company In Cheque Dishonour Case, Imposes Fine Of ₹1.83 Crore
1 month, 3 weeks ago

Section 138 NI Act | Mumbai Court Convicts Pharma Company In Cheque Dishonour Case, Imposes Fine Of ₹1.83 Crore

Live Law  

A Magistrate Court in Mumbai has recently convicted Elder Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for the offence of dishonour of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, imposing a cost of Rs. 1 had issued cheque to the complainant for discharge of legal liability and it was presented by complainant to bank and even after statutory demand notice accused failed …

Section 138 Of NI Act Warrants Strict Construction, Compliance With Proviso Clauses Is A Precondition Before Prosecution: J&K High Court
1 month, 3 weeks ago

Section 138 Of NI Act Warrants Strict Construction, Compliance With Proviso Clauses Is A Precondition Before Prosecution: J&K High Court

Live Law  

Quashing multiple complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 citing failure to adhere to mandatory conditions laid down in the Act the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has ruled that Section 138 of the Act being penal in nature, indisputably, warrants strict construction, hence making compliance with its proviso clauses,, and essential before initiating …

Section 143A NI Act | Interim Compensation To Complainant In Cheque Bounce Case Introduced In 2018 Amendment Is Prospective: Rajasthan HC
2 months ago

Section 143A NI Act | Interim Compensation To Complainant In Cheque Bounce Case Introduced In 2018 Amendment Is Prospective: Rajasthan HC

Live Law  

The Jaipur bench of the Rajasthan High Court has reiterated that Section 143A, Negotiable Instruments Act, inserted after an amendment in 2018 introducing payment of interim compensation to complainant in a cheque bouncing case, has prospective application and cannot be applied to complaints filed before the amendment in a retrospective manner. Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand relied upon the Supreme Court …

S.142 NI Act | Improper To Dismiss/Quash Cheque Dishonour Complaint Of Company At Threshold On Question Of Authorisation : Supreme Court
2 months, 2 weeks ago

S.142 NI Act | Improper To Dismiss/Quash Cheque Dishonour Complaint Of Company At Threshold On Question Of Authorisation : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court today, reiterated that in the dishonour of cheque cases, where complainant is a company, it is necessary to show during the trial that the complaint, if not filed by the payee, is filed by someone having knowledge of complainant's contents. "When the company is the payee of the cheque based on which a complaint is filed under …

S. 138 NI Act | Complainant Can't Be Left Remediless Merely Because He Filed 'Premature' Complaint For Cheque Dishonour: Rajasthan HC
2 months, 3 weeks ago

S. 138 NI Act | Complainant Can't Be Left Remediless Merely Because He Filed 'Premature' Complaint For Cheque Dishonour: Rajasthan HC

Live Law  

“ From the aforesaid law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Yogendra Pratap Singh and Gajanand Burange, it is apparent that in a case where the complaint was filed before the expiry of a period of fifteen days stipulated in the notice which is required to be served upon the drawer of the cheque, the Court …

S.138 NI Act | Director Who Signed Cheque Not Liable For Dishonour When Company Hasn't Been Added As Accused : Supreme Court
3 months ago

S.138 NI Act | Director Who Signed Cheque Not Liable For Dishonour When Company Hasn't Been Added As Accused : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court reiterated that the authorised signatory of a company cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of a cheque drawn on the company's account unless the company is arraigned as the principal accused. The Sessions Court upheld the conviction, but the Calcutta High Court reversed it, ruling that the cheque …

S. 148 NI Act | Signatory Of Cheque Issued By Company Can't Be Directed To Pay Compensation For Suspension Of Sentence : Supreme Court
3 months, 2 weeks ago

S. 148 NI Act | Signatory Of Cheque Issued By Company Can't Be Directed To Pay Compensation For Suspension Of Sentence : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court recently reiterated that the official signatory of the company does not assume the status of a 'drawer of a cheque' to attract the liability for payment of compensation under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. “To wit, as in the case of the position qua Section 143A, NI Act, merely because an officer of a …

Cognizance Of Cheque Dishonour U/S 138 NI Act Can Be Taken Only Upon A Written Complaint: Jharkhand High Court Reiterates
4 months ago

Cognizance Of Cheque Dishonour U/S 138 NI Act Can Be Taken Only Upon A Written Complaint: Jharkhand High Court Reiterates

Live Law  

While hearing a cheque bouncing case, the Jharkhand High Court has reaffirmed that cognizance of offences under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not require a report to the police nor empowers the court to direct the police to investigate the complaint. The court further clarified that under Section 142 of the NI Act the cognizance of an …

[S.138 NI Act] Not Making Company Separate Accused In Cheque Bouncing Complaint Isn't Fatal To Prosecution Case: Jharkhand HC
4 months, 1 week ago

[S.138 NI Act] Not Making Company Separate Accused In Cheque Bouncing Complaint Isn't Fatal To Prosecution Case: Jharkhand HC

Live Law  

A single judge bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, presiding over the case, remarked, “ From perusal of the complaint petition, the Court finds that although the company has not been made accused separately, but complainant has made the Director as accused who has signed the cheque as an accused and mentioned the company name i.e. The Court noted that …

High Court Rejects Plea to Dismiss Cheque Bounce Complaint
4 months, 3 weeks ago

High Court Rejects Plea to Dismiss Cheque Bounce Complaint

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that a complaint for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act would be maintainable, even if a civil suit for recovery of the money is instituted. The court relied on the Apex court judgment in the case of D.PURUSHOTAMA REDDY v. K.SATEESH, (2008) 8 SCC 505, which held that two …

Negotiable Instruments Act | Court Can Compound Offences U/S 147 Even After Conviction: Himachal Pradesh High Court
7 months ago

Negotiable Instruments Act | Court Can Compound Offences U/S 147 Even After Conviction: Himachal Pradesh High Court

Live Law  

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has ruled that under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, offences can be compounded even after the recording of a conviction by the court. Justice Sandeep Sharma delivered this judgment while hearing a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, read with Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. …

[Cheque Dishonour] Accused Often Get Away Due To Lack Of Evidence, Courts Must Acknowledge Friendly Cash Loans Between Parties: Delhi HC
7 months ago

[Cheque Dishonour] Accused Often Get Away Due To Lack Of Evidence, Courts Must Acknowledge Friendly Cash Loans Between Parties: Delhi HC

Live Law  

While hearing a matter on cheque bounce under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the Delhi High Court recently said that it would be prudent for courts to acknowledge that friendly cash loans are provided between parties without an existing document trail, with accused often getting acquitted because the complainant is unable to prove the existence of a debt. A single judge …

Proceedings U/S 138 N.I. Act Justified In Cases Arising From Commercial Transactions Regardless Of Their Civil Nature: J&K High Court
7 months, 2 weeks ago

Proceedings U/S 138 N.I. Act Justified In Cases Arising From Commercial Transactions Regardless Of Their Civil Nature: J&K High Court

Live Law  

The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has ruled that proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are justified in cases stemming from commercial transactions, regardless of the civil nature of the underlying transaction. Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which outlines penalties for cheque dishonour due to insufficient funds would apply to bolster the reliability …

Discharge Of Debt By Drawer To Be Determined At Trial, Can't Be Ground For Quashing Cheque Bounce Case U/S 138 NI Act: Jharkhand HC
8 months, 1 week ago

Discharge Of Debt By Drawer To Be Determined At Trial, Can't Be Ground For Quashing Cheque Bounce Case U/S 138 NI Act: Jharkhand HC

Live Law  

The Jharkhand High Court has dismissed a petition to quash a cheque bounce case, emphasizing that determining whether the petitioner had settled the debt for which the cheques were issued is a factual matter requiring a full trial. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary, presiding over the case, observed, “Now whether or not the petitioner has discharged the debt for which the …

S.138 NI Act - Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't Be Transferred At The Instance Of Accused : Supreme Court
8 months, 3 weeks ago

S.138 NI Act - Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't Be Transferred At The Instance Of Accused : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court today observed that transfer of a case for the offence of dishonour of cheque under S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 cannot be sought at the instance of the accused.The vacation bench of Justices AS Oka and Rajesh Bindal dismissed a transfer petition sought at the behest of the accused involved in the offence under …

[NI Act] If Interest Is Claimed On Cheque Which Doesn't Include Interest Component, It Does Not Remain Legally Enforceable Debt: Punjab & Haryana HC
9 months ago

[NI Act] If Interest Is Claimed On Cheque Which Doesn't Include Interest Component, It Does Not Remain Legally Enforceable Debt: Punjab & Haryana HC

Live Law  

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has made it clear that if interest is claimed on a cheque which does not include an interest component either by adjustments or by filling in the amount, the said cheque does not remain a legally enforceable debt or other liability under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.The Court quashed the complaint lodged under …

Dishonour of cheque of erstwhile bank not an offence: HC
9 months, 1 week ago

Dishonour of cheque of erstwhile bank not an offence: HC

Hindustan Times  

The Allahabad high court has ruled that cheques from erstwhile banks became ‘invalid’ after September 30, 2021. For representation only Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal observed while allowing a petition filed by one Archana Singh Gautam seeking quashing of the entire criminal proceeding, including the impugned summoning order in a Complaint Case under Section 138 NI Act. “From the perusal …

Cheques Dishonored With Endorsements 'Insufficient Fund', 'Account Closed', 'Signature Mismatch' Attract S. 138 NI Act: Allahabad HC
9 months, 3 weeks ago

Cheques Dishonored With Endorsements 'Insufficient Fund', 'Account Closed', 'Signature Mismatch' Attract S. 138 NI Act: Allahabad HC

Live Law  

The Allahabad High Court has observed that if the cheque is dishonoured and returned with the endorsements - case referred to drawer, instruction for stoppage of payment, exceeds arrangement, insufficient fund, signature differed or mismatch or account closed - then it will be sufficient for prima facie case for issuing process under Section 138 NI Act. A bench of Justice …

S.138 NI Act | Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Decision Allowing Amendment Of Cheque Date Mentioned In Complaint
10 months, 2 weeks ago

S.138 NI Act | Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Decision Allowing Amendment Of Cheque Date Mentioned In Complaint

Live Law  

The Supreme Court recently set aside a judgment of the High Court which allowed a complainant in a cheque dishonour case to amend the date of the cheque mentioned in the complaint.The Supreme Court noted that the amendment application was moved after the evidence stage was over. The Supreme Court recently set aside a judgment of the High Court which …

S.138 NI Act | Courts Can't Compel Complainant To Give Consent For Compounding, Mere Repayment Won't Absolve Accused : Supreme Court
10 months, 3 weeks ago

S.138 NI Act | Courts Can't Compel Complainant To Give Consent For Compounding, Mere Repayment Won't Absolve Accused : Supreme Court

Live Law  

Recently, the Supreme Court observed that the Courts cannot compel the complainant in a cheque dishonour case to give consent for the compounding of the complaint merely because the accused has compensated the complainant.The Court also observed that mere repayment of the amount cannot mean that the appellant is absolved from the criminal liabilities under Section 138 of the. Recently, …

[NI Act] MP High Court Refuses Permission To Rectify Incorrect Mention Of Cheque Dates In Complaint, Says It's A Substantial Defect
11 months, 2 weeks ago

[NI Act] MP High Court Refuses Permission To Rectify Incorrect Mention Of Cheque Dates In Complaint, Says It's A Substantial Defect

Live Law  

Madhya Pradesh High Court has iterated that the defect of mentioning incorrect dates of cheque in the complaint cannot be cured since there is no provision in the CrPC to amend the criminal complaint. Justice Verma, therefore, opined that the trial court had committed an error by allowing the application for making amendments to the original complaint filed under Section …

[Cheque Dishonour] Complainant Failed To Prove Cheque Was Issued Against Legally Enforceable Debt: Kerala High Court Acquits Accused
1 year ago

[Cheque Dishonour] Complainant Failed To Prove Cheque Was Issued Against Legally Enforceable Debt: Kerala High Court Acquits Accused

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has held that a complainant under the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot rely on the presumption that the holder of a negotiable instrument has paid consideration for it when his claim is inconsistent.It upheld the acquittal of the accused upon noting that the complainant in the present case had failed to prove that the cheque had been …

S.138 NI Act | Cause Of Action U/S 142(1)(B) Only Arises After Expiry Of 15 Days For Payment Of Amount: Allahabad High Court
1 year ago

S.138 NI Act | Cause Of Action U/S 142(1)(B) Only Arises After Expiry Of 15 Days For Payment Of Amount: Allahabad High Court

Live Law  

The Allahabad High Court has held that the cause of action under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 arises after expiry of 15 days granted to the drawer to pay the amount to the payee/cheque holder under clause of Section 138 of the Act. Section 142 of the NI Act provides that a complaint must be made within …

Blank Cheque Voluntarily Signed & Handed Over By Drawer Towards Payment Attracts Presumption Under S.139 NI Act : Supreme Court
1 year, 1 month ago

Blank Cheque Voluntarily Signed & Handed Over By Drawer Towards Payment Attracts Presumption Under S.139 NI Act : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has reiterated that a blank cheque leaf, which has been voluntarily signed by the drawer and handed over to the payee towards some payment, will carry the presumption that it was issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt as per Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. ".even if a blank cheque leaf is voluntarily signed …

[S.138 NI Act] Must Examine Those With Direct Knowledge Of Transaction To Prove Allegations Of Cheque Dishonour: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Conviction
1 year, 1 month ago

[S.138 NI Act] Must Examine Those With Direct Knowledge Of Transaction To Prove Allegations Of Cheque Dishonour: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Conviction

Live Law  

The Kerala High Court has stated that the prosecution has to examine a witness who had direct knowledge regarding the transaction, issuance and execution of the cheque to prove dishonour of the cheque. Justice A. Badharudeen observed that the examination of a witness who had no direct knowledge regarding the transaction or issuance of the cheque would be insufficient to …

High Court Under S. 482 CrPC Should Not Decide Whether Debt In Cheque Dishonour Case Is Time-Barred: Supreme Court
1 year, 1 month ago

High Court Under S. 482 CrPC Should Not Decide Whether Debt In Cheque Dishonour Case Is Time-Barred: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court recently reiterated that in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the question of whether the underlying debt is time-barred is based on the evidence. “Undoubtedly, the question regarding the time-barred nature of an underlying debt or liability in proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act is a mixed question of law and …

S.138 NI Act | Proceedings For Cheque Dishonour Be Quashed Once Complainant Signs Deed Accepting Amount In Full & Final Settlement: Supreme Court
1 year, 2 months ago

S.138 NI Act | Proceedings For Cheque Dishonour Be Quashed Once Complainant Signs Deed Accepting Amount In Full & Final Settlement: Supreme Court

Live Law  

In a Criminal Appeal arising out of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Supreme Court held that once the settlement has been arrived at and the complainant has signed the deed accepting an amount in full and final settlement, the proceedings under this provision must be quashed. “Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the …

S.138 NI Act : Supreme Court Slams Accused In Cheque Bounce Case For Not Honouring Undertaking To Pay; Imposes Rs 5 Lakhs Cost
1 year, 2 months ago

S.138 NI Act : Supreme Court Slams Accused In Cheque Bounce Case For Not Honouring Undertaking To Pay; Imposes Rs 5 Lakhs Cost

Live Law  

The Supreme Court took a strong stand while affirming the suspension of the accused/ present appellant's sentence, who was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.The Court highlighted that the complainant has been litigating since 2007, i.e., for almost 16 years, but has not been able to receive its due amount. The Supreme Court took a strong …

Cheque Dishonour | Onus On Accused To Prove Cheque Issued Towards Repayment Of Loan Was Misused By Complainant: Karnataka High Court
1 year, 3 months ago

Cheque Dishonour | Onus On Accused To Prove Cheque Issued Towards Repayment Of Loan Was Misused By Complainant: Karnataka High Court

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has held that in a cheque bounce case, the onus is on the accused to prove that the cheque was misused after it was issued to another person in lieu of a loan borrowed from them and thus did not amount to a legally enforceable debt. The primary contention of the accused was that the complainant …

S.138 NI Act | Availability Of Funds In Other Bank Accounts Not A Defence; Cheque Dishonour Relates To Specific Account: Supreme Court
1 year, 3 months ago

S.138 NI Act | Availability Of Funds In Other Bank Accounts Not A Defence; Cheque Dishonour Relates To Specific Account: Supreme Court

Live Law  

Recently, the Supreme Court categorically held that in proceedings initiated for bounced cheques, the defence that there are sufficient funds in the other bank accounts cannot be appreciated.“In a proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused cannot rely upon other bank accounts for. Recently, the Supreme Court categorically held that in proceedings initiated for bounced cheques, …

S.138 NI Act | Offence Can Be Compounded At Initial Stage Without Complainant's Consent, Provided They Are Duly Compensated
1 year, 3 months ago

S.138 NI Act | Offence Can Be Compounded At Initial Stage Without Complainant's Consent, Provided They Are Duly Compensated

Live Law  

The Bombay High Court recently held that a court can compound the offence in check bounce cases without the complainant's consent provided that the accused applied for compounding in the initial stages of the case and the complainant was adequately compensated. “when the application for compounding offences u/s 138 of the NI Act is made at the initial stage of …

s138 NI Act | Complainant Had No Right Over Property, Misused Cheques Issued To Grandfather: Karnataka High Court Upholds Accused's Acquittal
1 year, 3 months ago

s138 NI Act | Complainant Had No Right Over Property, Misused Cheques Issued To Grandfather: Karnataka High Court Upholds Accused's Acquittal

Live Law  

It held: It is admitted that neither her grandfather nor her maternal uncle has promised her to give. It appears that the cheques said to have been issued as security in respect of the sale transaction of property with Sri.H.V.Venkatappa Reddy have been misused by the complainant. The Karnataka High Court has dismissed an appeal upon noting that the appellant/complainant …

[Cheque Dishonour] Accused Must Take 'Probable Defence' To Rebut Adverse Presumption U/S 139 NI Act: Karnataka High Court Reiterates
1 year, 3 months ago

[Cheque Dishonour] Accused Must Take 'Probable Defence' To Rebut Adverse Presumption U/S 139 NI Act: Karnataka High Court Reiterates

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has reiterated that to rebut the presumption under Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act that cheque has been issued in discharge of a debt or liability, the accused must raise 'probable defence'. Faced with accused's mere denial regarding the existence of debt, Justice S Rachaiah remarked, “If the defence taken by the accused is not acceptable obviously …

Cheque Dishonour Cases - What Should Courts Ask Accused Once Presumption Under S.139 NI Act Is Applicable? Supreme Court Explains
1 year, 5 months ago

Cheque Dishonour Cases - What Should Courts Ask Accused Once Presumption Under S.139 NI Act Is Applicable? Supreme Court Explains

Live Law  

Reiterating the principles relating to the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, the Supreme Court reversed the acquittal of an accused in a case for cheque dishonour.A bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and SVN Bhatti observed that there was a "fundamental flaw" in the approach taken by both the Trial Court and the High Court.Summarising the …

Section 138 NI Act| 'Notice Not Invalid If Other Amount Is Separately Indicated Therein Along With Cheque Amount': Allahabad High Court
1 year, 10 months ago

Section 138 NI Act| 'Notice Not Invalid If Other Amount Is Separately Indicated Therein Along With Cheque Amount': Allahabad High Court

Live Law  

The Allahabad High Court has held that if in a demand notice, other amounts are mentioned along with the cheque amount in a separate portion in detail, the said notice can not be faulted in a legal term of Section 138 of the Act, 1881.For context, as per Section 138 of the 1881 Act, the payee or the holder in …

Not Proper To Shift Burden On Complainant To Prove NI Act Case Beyond ‘Reasonable Doubt’ When Accused Didn’t Respond To Statutory Notice: Gujarat High Court
1 year, 10 months ago

Not Proper To Shift Burden On Complainant To Prove NI Act Case Beyond ‘Reasonable Doubt’ When Accused Didn’t Respond To Statutory Notice: Gujarat High Court

Live Law  

While allowing a leave to appeal against acquittal in a criminal case under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, the Gujarat High Court said the Magistrate's approach in shifting the burden upon the complainant to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt was not proper “when the accused has chosen not to question the financial capacity of complainant at very first …

Supreme Court Annual Digest 2022- Negotiable Instruments Act
2 years, 2 months ago

Supreme Court Annual Digest 2022- Negotiable Instruments Act

Live Law  

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 3 - Banker Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 3 - ‘Banker’ includes any person acting as a banker and any post office savings bank. Pradeep Kumar v. Post Master General, 2022 LiveLaw 139 : 6 SCC 351 Section 13 - “Negotiable instrument” Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 13 - Different principles apply for …

Merely Being Signatory To A Cheque Does Not Make A Person Guilty Of Offence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court
2 years, 3 months ago

Merely Being Signatory To A Cheque Does Not Make A Person Guilty Of Offence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has said that prima facie, merely being a signatory to a cheque does not, in itself, make a person guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.Observing that the offence is triggered at the stage when a cheque is returned unpaid by the bank for insufficiency of funds, Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani …

Section 138 NI Act | Infirmity In Cheque Return Memo Does Not Render Entire Trial As Nullity: Delhi High Court
2 years, 3 months ago

Section 138 NI Act | Infirmity In Cheque Return Memo Does Not Render Entire Trial As Nullity: Delhi High Court

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has held that any infirmity in the cheque return memo does not render the entire trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as nullity.Observing that cheque return memo is a memo informing the payee and its banker about the dishonour of a cheque, Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain said if the said cheque return memo …

Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Includes A Presumption That There Exists A Legally Enforceable Debt Or Liability : Supreme Court
2 years, 4 months ago

Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Includes A Presumption That There Exists A Legally Enforceable Debt Or Liability : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court reiterated that the presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act includes a presumption that there exists a legally enforceable debt or liability.In this case, the Trial Court dismissed a cheque bounce complaint on the ground that the complainant was not able to adduce sufficient evidence that he was in a position to advance a loan of …

Cheque Dishonour- Additional Accused Cannot Be Impleaded After Expiry Of Limitation Period Under Sec 142 NI Act : Supreme Court
2 years, 4 months ago

Cheque Dishonour- Additional Accused Cannot Be Impleaded After Expiry Of Limitation Period Under Sec 142 NI Act : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court held that impleadment of additional accused subsequent to the filing of a cheque bounce complaint is not permissible once the limitation prescribed for taking cognizance of the offence under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has expired.In this case, the High Court quashed a summoning order passed by a Magistrate in a cheque bounce complaint on …

Discover Related