Coal Block Case: Delhi High Court Quashes PMLA Case Against EMTA Coal After CBI Files Closure Report In 2015 FIR
Live LawThe Delhi High Court has quashed the ECIR and attachment orders passed by the Enforcement Directorate against EMTA Coal Limited and other individuals, observing that if there is an acquittal or discharge or a closure report has been filed in the predicate offence, the ECIR would not stand and the same would be liable to be quashed. The attachments orders passed by ED last year were stayed by the court in March and August 2022 after taking note of the submission that CBI has filed a closure report in the predicate offence. Reliance was placed on Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India & Ors and Prakash Industries v. Directorate of Enforcement to argue that once the scheduled offence itself has come to an end resulting in discharge or acquittal and no proceedings are pending against the petitioners, the attachment orders cannot continue in view of the fact that section 3 of the PMLA contemplates that a predicate offence is a necessary precondition for any assets to be considered as “proceeds of crime.” The counsel representing the ED, while relying on Vijay Madanlal Choudhary, argued that irrespective of whether the predicate offence exists or not, unless and until the trial court comes to a conclusion that the assets are not proceeds of crime, the attachment orders can continue and the ED can file an independent complaint in such a case. "A perusal of the orders passed in Parvathi Kollur as also in the other three judgments referred above leaves no matter of doubt in the mind of the Court that if there is an acquittal/ discharge or a closure report has been filed in the predicate offence, the ECIR would not stand and the same would be liable to be quashed," it added.