The pressing need to recode the IBC
Live MintThere was a palpable sense of relief across corporate India when the Supreme Court gave its stamp of approval to ArcerlorMittal’s takeover of the troubled Essar Steel under the debt resolution process of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Deep-pocketed powerful corporates in India have managed to indefinitely delay the corporate insolvency resolution process, and evade repercussions, by continuously putting the IBC to test in the court of law. “Government has so far played a proactive role in de-cluttering any ambiguities,” says Sanjeev Krishan, partner and deals leader, PwC Essar Steel Ltd’s facility near Pune The mindset change To be sure, IBC has been able to do the unthinkable—put Indian corporates on tenterhooks. Therefore, during the early days of the IBC law, it was established that the 270 day-timeline never includes ‘objection time’ in NCLT. Funds love to block their returns, over a specified period of time, and CIRP will be unattractive if they cannot invest and divest on time.” The new IBC The real challenge is in the courts that are hearing cases against its amendments introducing a 330-day limit, including time for litigation, for implementing the resolution plan.