EXPLAINED | Abortion, tech and surveillance
With abortion now or soon to be illegal in over a dozen states and severely restricted in many more, Big Tech companies that vacuum up personal details of their users are facing new calls to limit that tracking and surveillance. With the Supreme Court’s Friday overruling of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion, collected location data, text messages, search histories, emails and seemingly innocuous period and ovulation-tracking apps could be used to prosecute people who seek an abortion — or medical care for a miscarriage — as well as those who assist them. “While receiving care from medical staff, she was also immediately treated with suspicion of committing a crime,” civil rights attorney and Ford Foundation fellow Cynthia Conti-Cook wrote in her 2020 paper, “Surveilling the Digital Abortion Diary.” Fisher’s “statements to nurses, the medical records, and the autopsy records of her fetus were turned over to the local police to investigate whether she intentionally killed her fetus,” she wrote. “In this new environment, tech companies must step up and play a crucial role in protecting women’s digital privacy and access to online information,” said Givens, of the Center for Democracy and Technology, said. Clue, which also has a period tracking app, said it keeps users’ health data — particularly related to pregnancies, pregnancy loss or abortion — “private and safe” with data encryption.






Lawyers preparing for abortion prosecutions sound the alarm on health care data privacy

Women 'should use encrypted period tracker apps to protect data', expert warns



















Discover Related

The ‘parental consent’ problem with the draft rules of the DPDP Act

Democratic Senators Call for Privacy Act Reform in Response to DOGE Takeover

‘People should be worried’: 23andMe bankruptcy could expose customers’ genetic data

“Cops, AI, drug companies”: Who wants to buy your DNA from 23andme?

Why are users of 23andMe being urged to delete their data?

23andMe goes bankrupt: What happens to your stored DNA data now?

Tech firms must start protecting UK users from illegal content

California Democrats eye new way to resist Trump’s immigration crackdown

TikTok and others investigated over use of children’s data

Apple launches 'age assurance' tech as U.S. states mull social media laws

Ofcom to ‘shine light’ on sites not doing enough to protect women and girls

Regulator takes action against apps for illegally collecting, using personal data

Regulator takes action against apps for illegally collecting, using personal data

Punjab govt’s anti-drug drive sparks data privacy concerns

ACLU Warns DOGE's 'Unchecked' Access Could Violate Federal Law

New Digital Rules Let You Wipe All Your Details Online

CCI's WhatsApp order revives question on regulatory turf

Trump's federal health website scrubs 'abortion' search results

Government's reproductive rights resource goes dark hours into new Trump administration
