Takeaways from the House Judiciary Committee’s first impeachment hearing
CNNCNN — On Wednesday morning, the House Judiciary Committee convened its first hearing in the impeachment investigation into President Donald Trump – bringing in four constitutional lawyers to debate what, exactly, constitutes “high crimes and misdemeanors” and whether the President had committed any of those acts. Republicans ignore facts, focus on the ‘why’ behind impeachment push Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, used his opening statement not to dispute the basic facts surrounding the July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky but rather to trace the origins of calls for the President to be impeached. “What a start of a party.” One of the four – Stanford Law professor Pam Karlan – took considerable umbrage at Collins’ dismissals. “Everything I know about our Constitution and its values and my review of the evidentiary record – and here Mr. Collins, I would like to say to you, sir, that I read transcripts of every one of the witnesses who appeared in the live hearing because I would not speak about these things without reviewing the facts, so I’m insulted by the suggestion that as a law professor I don’t care about those facts,” Karlan scolded the Georgia Republican.