
Easing Educational Qualification To Prioritise Experience Can't Be Stretched To Dilute Criteria, State's Approach Anathema To Law: Gujarat HC
Live LawStriking down the appointment of a District Commandant, Home Guard, in Narmada District, the Gujarat High Court observed that the appointee lacked the requisite educational qualifications. While expounding on Section 2 of the Gujarat Home Guards Act, 1947, the Court stated, “Thus, the State Government has appointed the respondent No.3, by ignoring the statutory provisions and also Clause-2 of the Guidelines dated 29.09.2018, which categorically mentions that the first preference shall be given to the candidate, whose minimum educational qualification is upto the level of graduation.” “In the present case, the appellant, who is a graduate candidate and holding a Bachelor of Commerce Degree, is not selected however, respondent No.3, who is 9th Standard, has been selected on the post of District Commandant, Home Guards. The Court also noted that for the appointment of Home Guards on honorarium basis, their educational qualification prescribed is minimum 10th Standard, as per the provisions of 3 of the Circular dated September 23, 2018. When queried by the Court, the Assistant Government Pleader defended the appointment by stating that the respondent was chosen for his prior experience as a District Commandant Home Guard, by invoking Clause-12 of the Guidelines dated September 29, 2018, which specifies that the State Government can appoint the District Commandant of Home Guards by ignoring the provisions of Section 2 of the Gujarat Home Guards Act, 1947. As the Court stated, “It is shocking to note that the Clause-12 directs that the appointment to the post of District Commandant can be made by ignoring the statutory provisions of the Gujarat Home Guards Act, 1947.” Thus, the Court set aside both the Single Judge's order and the respondent's appointment.
History of this topic

Gujarat HC Dismisses Pleas By Linguistic, Religious Minority Schools Against Amendment Enabling State To Regulate Recruitment Of Teachers
Live Law
'Training Makes A Lot Of Difference': Gujarat High Court Directs Advocate General To Establish Judicial Academy For Aspiring Lawyers
Live Law
'Can State Be Directed to Consider Degree Holders When Recruitment Rules for Govt Post Say Only Diploma Holders Eligible? SC Issues Notice
Live Law
Employer Is Justified In Excluding Candidates With Higher Qualification For Recruitment To A Particular Post: J&K&L High Court
Live Law![Educational Qualifications Prescribed For Public Posts Are Not Relaxable: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Educational Qualifications Prescribed For Public Posts Are Not Relaxable: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Gujarat HC Quashes 5-Yr Experience Requirement For Those Working In Court, Allied Departments To Become Eligible For Judicial Service [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Gujarat HC Quashes 5-Yr Experience Requirement For Those Working In Court, Allied Departments To Become Eligible For Judicial Service [Read Judgment]
Live Law![Gujarat HC Quashes 5-Yr Experience Requirement For Those Working In Court, Allied Departments To Become Eligible For Judicial Service [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Gujarat HC Quashes 5-Yr Experience Requirement For Those Working In Court, Allied Departments To Become Eligible For Judicial Service [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related















































