SC seeks Centre's response on pleas challenging constitutional validity of Section 35, 36 of UAPA Act
FirstpostNew Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday sought the Centre’s response on PILs seeking direction to declare unconstitutional the Unlawful Activities Amendment Act, 2019, that confers power upon the Central government to designate an individual as a terrorist. Section 35 of UAPA 2019 does not specify detailed grounds or reasons based on which an individual can be termed as a terrorist, said the plea, adding that conferring of such an “arbitrary and unfettered power without any limits or bounds” amounts to a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Awasthi’s petition stated, “The new or amended Section 35 of the UAPA Act, 1967 empowers the Central government to categorise any individual as terrorist and add the name of such a person in Schedule 4 of the Act. It added that the UAPA, 2019 “does not afford an opportunity to an individual, being categorised as terrorist, to present his/her case and let such individuals to live on the whim and caprice of the society therein after.” The amended Section 35 of the UAPA, 1967 “directly and adversely affects the Fundamental Right to free speech and expression” as enshrined under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.