![[IT Act] Section 80IB Doesn't Mandate Setting Off Losses Of One Eligible Unit Against Profits Of Another Eligible Unit: Mumbai ITAT](/static/images/error.jpg)
[IT Act] Section 80IB Doesn't Mandate Setting Off Losses Of One Eligible Unit Against Profits Of Another Eligible Unit: Mumbai ITAT
Live LawThe Mumbai ITAT recently clarified that an industrial undertaking was not required to set off the losses incurred by it in one eligible unit against the profits earned from another eligible unit for the purpose of calculating deduction u/s 80-IB. As per Section 80-I of Income tax Act, 1961, where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and gains derived from an industrial undertaking or a ship or the business of a hotel or the business of repairs to ocean-going vessels or other powered craft to which this section applies, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, in computing the total income of the assessee, a deduction from such profits and gains of an amount equal to twenty per cent thereof. Referring to the decision in case of CIT v. Dewan Kraft Systems 297 ITR 305, the Division Bench of Saktijit Dey and Narendra Kumar Billaiya reiterated that “in computing the gross total income of assessee, the same has to be determined after adjusting the losses and that, if the gross total income of the assessee so determined turns out to be 'Nil', then the assessee would not be entitled to deduction under Chapter VI-A of the said Act”. Referring to the decision of Apex Court in Synco Industries Ltd. v. Assessing Officer, 299 ITR 444, the Bench pointed that the Supreme Court did not at all hold that while computing the deduction u/s 80-I, the loss of one eligible industrial undertaking is to be set off against the profit of another eligible industrial undertaking.
History of this topic

Enterprise Manufacturing Specified Items In Designated States Can Seek Tax Deduction U/S 80IC Income Tax Act Without Agreement With Govt: Delhi HC
Live Law
Income Tax Deduction Available On Excise Duty Claim As It Does Not Amount To Double Deduction: Bombay High Court
Live Law
S. 80-IB Of Income Tax Act - Assessee Not Entitled To Deduction Under On Profit Derived From DEPB And Duty Drawback Schemes: Supreme Court
Live Law
Twin Conditions In Section 10B (8) Income Tax Act Has To Be Fulfilled To Claim Exemption Relief: Supreme Court
Live Law![Deduction Under Section 80HH Income Tax Act Should Be From 'Gross Profits & Gains' Instead Of 'Net Income' : SC [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
Deduction Under Section 80HH Income Tax Act Should Be From 'Gross Profits & Gains' Instead Of 'Net Income' : SC [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related


![[S.292B Income Tax Act] Inadvertent Mistakes In Reassessment Can Be Saved But Assessment Order Overlooking Apparent Error Cannot: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)











![[Income Tax] Assessing Officer Not Only An Adjudicator But Also An Investigator, Cannot Remain Oblivious To Claim Without Enquiry: Kerala HC](/static/images/error.jpg)

![[S.151 IT Act] SC Judgment In Rajeev Bansal Doesn't Affirm Authority Of Joint Commissioner To Accord Approvals For Reassessment: Delhi HC](/static/images/error.jpg)


![[Income Tax] Allahabad HC To Examine Whether Proceedings U/S 148A(b) Initiated Prior To 01.09.2024 Would Be Saved After Enforcement Of The Finance (No.2) Act, 2024](/static/images/error.jpg)







![Tax Weekly Round-Up [23rd December - 29th December 2024]](/static/images/error.jpg)














![[Income Tax Act] Placing Funds In One Account Before Transferring It To Another Does Not Attract S. 69A: Allahabad High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
![[Income Tax] No Substantial Question Of Law Arises If Perversity Cannot Be Shown In Order Passed By Tribunal: Allahabad High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)
