Periodic Audit Of Performance Of Individual Judges & Judiciary Needed To Maintain Standards : Justice Chelameswar
Live LawIt is both an honour and pleasure to participate in this programme in memory of a departed friend, Mr. Kannabiran. Prior to the Supreme Court Advocates Association case, when governments had considerable say in the matter, many suggestions/recommendations made by the government turned out to be good. Government sat on the recommendations made by the CJs, government delayed the appointment process because the suggestions made by the CJs of a High Court or the Supreme Court was not to their liking. Post the Second Judges case, when the collegium had much greater say in the appointment process of the members of the constitutional courts, there are instances when the collegium did not exercise the authority strictly in accordance with the demands of the Constitution – letter and spirit of the constitution, as explained by the judgment of Supreme Court in the Second Judges case. India experimented with the regime that existed prior to the Second Judges case – that is when the government had a considerable say in the selection process, and eventually the Supreme Court said that this process is not very wholesome, looking at it from the point of independence of judiciary, which in turn is a condition precedent to the development of a healthy democracy.