Jammu & Kashmir High Court Quashes Rape FIR, Says Proposal For Live-In To Ascertain How Relationship Will Work Out Not False Promise To Marry
Live LawThe Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court recently quashed a rape FIR, observing that a proposal made by the accused to prosecutrix for live-In relationship, so as to ascertain how their relationship will work, does not tantamount to false promise to marry. The bench comprising Justice Sanjay Dhar observed, "He proposed to have live-in-relationship with her, meaning thereby that at the initial stage the petitioner had not indicated his intention to marry the prosecutrix but he only wanted to ascertain as to how their relationship will work out, whereafter he was to make up his mind as to whether or not he would enter into wedlock with the prosecutrix. The petitioner contended that the facts emanating from the record would clearly show that there was a long standing relationship between the petitioner and the prosecutrix, which has gone wrong but the same cannot amount to an offence under Section 376 IPC. At the outset, Justice Dhar observed that once the prosecutrix came to know that the family of the petitioner is not in favour of their marriage and live-in-relationship, prudence demanded that she, a mature girl of 38 years, should not have allowed the petitioner to stay with her and to have physical relationship with her.